Weak \((C_{11}^+)\) modules with ACC or DCC on essential submodules (Q1596458)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1743676
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Weak \((C_{11}^+)\) modules with ACC or DCC on essential submodules
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1743676

      Statements

      Weak \((C_{11}^+)\) modules with ACC or DCC on essential submodules (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      2 July 2002
      0 references
      Let \(R\) be an associative ring with nonzero identity element. A right \(R\)-module \(M\) is said to be a weak \(C_{11}\)-module if each of its semisimple submodules has a complement which is a direct summand of \(M\). The module \(M\) is said to be a weak \(C^+_{11}\)-module if each direct summand of \(M\) is a weak \(C_{11}\)-module. The aim of this paper is to investigate weak \(C^+_{11}\)-modules. Thus, the author proves that if \(M\) is a weak \(C^+_{11}\)-module and \(M/\text{Soc}(M)\) has finite Goldie dimension, then \(M=M_1\oplus M_2\) where \(M_1\) is semisimple and \(M_2\) has finite Goldie dimension. As a consequence, it follows that if \(M\) is a weak \(C^+_{11}\)-module satisfying the ACC (resp. DCC) on essential submodules, then \(M=M_1\oplus M_2\) for some semisimple submodule \(M_1\) and Noetherian (resp. Artinian) submodule \(M_2\).
      0 references
      DCC on essential submodules
      0 references
      ACC on essential submodules
      0 references
      weak \(C_{11}\)-modules
      0 references
      semisimple submodules
      0 references
      complements
      0 references
      direct summands
      0 references
      weak \(C^+_{11}\)-modules
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers