Derivatives of generalized distance functions and existence of generalized nearest points (Q1599250)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1750339
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Derivatives of generalized distance functions and existence of generalized nearest points
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1750339

      Statements

      Derivatives of generalized distance functions and existence of generalized nearest points (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      12 March 2003
      0 references
      Let \(X\) be a real Banach space of dimension at least 2, \(C\) a closed bounded convex subset of \(X\) with \(0\in\text{int }C\). The Minkowski functional \(p_C: X\to \mathbb{R}\) with respect to the set \(C\) is defined by \[ p_C(x)= \inf\{\alpha> 0: x\in\lambda C\},\quad \forall x\in X. \] For a closed nonempty subset \(G\) of \(X\), the generalized distance function is defined by \(d_G(x)= \inf_{z\in G} p_C(x- z)\), \(\forall x\in X\). A point \(z_0\in G\) with \(p_C(x- z_0)= d_G(x)\) is called a generalized nearest point to \(x\) from \(G\). For any \(x,y\in X\), the one-sided directional derivative of \(d_G\) at \(x\) is \[ d_G'(x)(y)= \lim_{t\to 0^+} {d_G(x+ ty)- d_G(x)\over t}. \] In this paper, the authors investigate the relationship between directional derivatives of generalized distance functions and the existence of generalized nearest points in Banach spaces. It is proved that if the one-sided diretional derivative of the generalized distance function associated to \(G\) at \(x\) equals to \(1\) or \(-1\), then the generalized nearest point to \(x\) from \(G\) exists, provided that \(X\) is a compactly locally uniformly convex Banach space. Moreover, a partial answer to the following open problem put forward by \textit{S. Fitzpatrick} [Bull. Austr. Math. Soc. 39, No. 2, 233-238 (1989; Zbl 0674.46011)] is given. If \(G\) is a closed subset of reflexive Banach space \(X\), is the set \[ D= \{x\in X\mid G; \exists y\in \text{Bd}(c)\text{ with }d_G'(x)(y)= 1\} \] residual in \(X\setminus G\)? Theorem 3.5 in the present paper says that the answer to the problem is affirmative if \(C\) is both strictly convex and Kadeč. Whether Theorem 3.5 remains true without this assumption remains not known.
      0 references
      compactly locally uniformly convex
      0 references
      strictly convex and Kadeč set
      0 references
      Minkowski functional
      0 references
      generalized distance function
      0 references
      generalized nearest point
      0 references
      directional derivatives
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers