An interpolant defined by subdivision and the analysis of the error (Q1612388)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
An interpolant defined by subdivision and the analysis of the error
scientific article

    Statements

    An interpolant defined by subdivision and the analysis of the error (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    22 August 2002
    0 references
    Given the equidistant interpolation points \((x_i,y_i)\), \(i=0,\ldots,n\) of a function \(y(x)\), an interpolating subdivision scheme estimates values at successive midpoints doubling the number of intervals at each iteration. This results in a function \(\hat{y}\) that approximates \(y\). The scheme used here is based on a cubic interpolating polynomial at 4 neighboring points, which is evaluated in its central point to find the new function value of \(\hat{y}\). At the boundaries, either cubic spline interpolation or asymmetric polynomial interpolation is used. This is closely related to the \(9/16\) scheme of \textit{S. Dubuc}'s interpolating subdivision [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 114, 185-204, 1986; Zbl 0615.65005)]. The main theorem gives error bounds for \(y\in{\mathcal C}^4\) in \(L^p\)-norm for \(p=1,2,\infty\). These bounds are \(O(h^4)\) with \(h\) the step size of the given \(x_i\) and it depends on the fourth derivative of \(y\) and on a function \(\alpha\) defined in the interpolation interval \([a,b]\) that is obtained by a subdivision-like scheme applied to the data \((a,0)\), \(((a+b)/2,1)\) and \((b,0)\). A numerical example shows that this scheme gives better results than the Shepard method, described by \textit{P. Lancaster} and \textit{K. Salkauskas} [Curve and surface fitting, Academic Press (1986; Zbl 0649.65012)].
    0 references
    interpolating subdivision
    0 references
    splines
    0 references
    Dubuc interpolation
    0 references
    cubic spline interpolation
    0 references
    error bounds
    0 references
    numerical example
    0 references
    Shepard method
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references