Inhomogeneous Jacobi matrices on trees (Q1615922)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6969573
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Inhomogeneous Jacobi matrices on trees |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6969573 |
Statements
Inhomogeneous Jacobi matrices on trees (English)
0 references
31 October 2018
0 references
The main object under consideration in the paper is the class of inhomogeneous Jacobi operators \(J\) on inhomogeneous trees \(\Gamma\). Precisely, such operators are defined on an appropriate domain in \(\ell^2(\Gamma)\) by the relation \[ Jv(x)=\lambda_x v(\eta(x))+\beta_x v(x)+\sum_{k=1}^d \lambda_{x_k} v(x_k), \] where \(\lambda_x\) are positive numbers, \(\beta_x\) are real numbers, and \(d=d_x\) are positive integers, depending on \(x\). Although the eigenvalue equation \[ zv(x)=\lambda_x v(\eta(x))+\beta_x v(x)+\sum_{k=1}^d \lambda_{x_k} v(x_k) \] cannot be resolved recursively (as in the classical case), the author shows that it has a nonzero solution for every nonreal number \(z\). The main focus is made upon the essential selfadjointness of the operator \(J\). It turns out that, unlike the homogeneous case, the operator \(J\) in some instances is not essentially self-adjoint, but the defect indices cannot be greater than 1. The author derives certain criteria for essential selfadjointness. The analog of the Carleman condition is established.
0 references
Jacobi matrix
0 references
inhomogeneous tree
0 references
essential self-adjointness
0 references
Carleman condition
0 references
0.8858070969581604
0 references
0.7831972241401672
0 references
0.7591559886932373
0 references