Small scale distribution of zeros and mass of modular forms (Q1644488)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Small scale distribution of zeros and mass of modular forms |
scientific article |
Statements
Small scale distribution of zeros and mass of modular forms (English)
0 references
21 June 2018
0 references
In this article, the authors study the equidistribution of zeros and mass of holomorphic Hecke cusp forms \(f\) of weight \(k\) with respect to \(\text{SL}_2(\mathbb Z)\) at small scales. They consider the distribution of zeros of \(f\) in two domains \(B(z,r_k)\) and \(\mathcal{F}_Y\) separately. Here \(B(z,r_k)\) is a hyperbolic ball contained in the canonical fundamental domain \(\mathcal{F}\) of \(\text{SL}_2(\mathbb Z)\) centered at \(z\) and of radius \(r_k\) with \(r_k\rightarrow 0\) sufficiently slowly as \(k\longrightarrow\infty\) and \(\mathcal{F}_Y\) is a neighborhood of the cusp of \(\mathcal{F}\) such that \(\mathcal{F}_Y=\{z\in \mathcal{F}~:~\text{Im}(z)>Y\},~~Y\geq\sqrt{k\log k}\). They show the following results: Let \(N_f(D)\) be the number of zeros of \(f\) in a domain \(D\) and \(A(D)\) the area of \(D\) by hyperbolic measure. Let \(B(z_0,r)\subset \{z\in\mathcal{F}~:~\text{Im}(z)\leq B\}\) for a fixed \(B>0\) and \(r\geq(\log k)^{-\delta_0/2+\varepsilon}\), where \(\delta_0=31/8-\sqrt{15}\). Then \(\frac{N_f(B(z_0,r))}{N_f(\mathcal{F)}}=\frac{A(B(z_0,r))}{A(\mathcal{F})}+O_B(r(\log k)^{-\delta_0/2+\varepsilon})~(k\rightarrow\infty)\). Further, if assuming the generalized Lindelöf hypothesis, in the above, the factor \((\log k)^{-\delta_0/2+\varepsilon}\) can be replaced by the smaller factor \(k^{-1/8+\varepsilon}\) for \(r\geq k^{-1/8+\varepsilon}\). As for the distribution of zeros in \(\mathcal{F}_Y\), \textit{A. Ghosh} and \textit{P. Sarnak} [J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 14, No. 2, 465--487 (2012; Zbl 1287.11054)] conjectured that almost all zeros \(\rho_f\) of \(f\) in \(\mathcal{F}_Y\) lie on two lines \(L_1:\text{Re}(z)=0,L_2:\text{Re}(z)=-1/2\) and gave a lower bound on the number of zeros on these lines. The authors show for almost all cusp forms \(f\) that \(\sharp\{\rho_f\in L_i\}\geq c(\varepsilon)\cdot \sharp\{\rho_f\in \mathcal{F}_Y\} ~(i=1,2)\), provided that \(\delta(\varepsilon)k>Y>\sqrt{k\log k}\) and \(k\rightarrow\infty\). The constants \(\delta(\varepsilon)\) and \(c(\varepsilon)\) are positive and depend only on \(\varepsilon\). Under the generalized Lindelöf hypothesis, they give a lower bound on the number of zeros on the line \(L_i\), which is significantly stronger than the previous results. Furthermore they show the following effective mass equidistribution for the mass of \(y^k|f(z)|\):~Let \(\phi\) be a smooth function supported in \(\mathcal{F}\) with \(\sup_{z\in\mathcal{F}}\left|y\frac{\partial^a}{\partial x^a}\frac{\partial^b}{\partial y^b}\phi(z)\right|\ll_{a,b}M^{a+b}\), \((z=x+iy, a,b,M\geq 1)\). Then,~ \(\left|\iint_{\mathcal{F}}y^k|f(z)|^2\phi(z)\frac{dxdy}{y^2}-\iint_{\mathcal{F}}\phi(z)\frac{dxdy}{y^2}\right|\ll_{\varepsilon}M^2(\log k)^{-4\delta_0+\varepsilon}, \) for all \(\varepsilon>0 \) fixed.
0 references
zeros of modular forms
0 references
mass equidistribution
0 references
automorphic forms
0 references