Acquisition war-gaming technique for acquiring future complex systems: modeling and simulation results for cost plus incentive fee contract (Q1649115)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6898735
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Acquisition war-gaming technique for acquiring future complex systems: modeling and simulation results for cost plus incentive fee contract
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6898735

      Statements

      Acquisition war-gaming technique for acquiring future complex systems: modeling and simulation results for cost plus incentive fee contract (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      5 July 2018
      0 references
      Summary: This paper provides a high-level discussion and propositions of frameworks and models for acquisition strategy of complex systems. In particular, it presents an innovative system engineering approach to model the Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition process and offers several optimization modules including simulation models using game theory and war-gaming concepts. Our frameworks employ Advanced Game-based Mathematical Framework (AGMF) and Unified Game-based Acquisition Framework (UGAF), and related advanced simulation and mathematical models that include a set of War-Gaming Engines (WGEs) implemented in MATLAB statistical optimization models. WGEs are defined as a set of algorithms, characterizing the Program and Technical Baseline (PTB), technology enablers, architectural solutions, contract type, contract parameters and associated incentives, and industry bidding position. As a proof of concept, Aerospace, in collaboration with the North Carolina State University (NCSU) and University of Hawaii (UH), successfully applied and extended the proposed frameworks and decision models to determine the optimum contract parameters and incentives for a Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract. As a result, we can suggest a set of acquisition strategies that ensure the optimization of the PTB.
      0 references
      game theory
      0 references
      Bayesian games
      0 references
      incentives
      0 references
      contract parameters
      0 references
      cost plus incentive fee (CPIF)
      0 references
      mathematical modelling
      0 references
      simulation
      0 references
      program and technical baseline (PTB)
      0 references
      acquisition strategy
      0 references
      space systems
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references