Alternatives to the least squares solution to Peelle's pertinent puzzle (Q1736483)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7042101
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Alternatives to the least squares solution to Peelle's pertinent puzzle
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7042101

      Statements

      Alternatives to the least squares solution to Peelle's pertinent puzzle (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      26 March 2019
      0 references
      Summary: Peelle's Pertinent Puzzle (PPP) was described in 1987 in the context of estimating fundamental parameters that arise in nuclear interaction experiments. In PPP, generalized least squares (GLS) parameter estimates fell outside the range of the data, which has raised concerns that GLS is somehow flawed and has led to suggested alternatives to GLS estimators. However, there have been no corresponding performance comparisons among methods, and one suggested approach involving simulated data realizations is statistically incomplete. Here we provide performance comparisons among estimators, introduce approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) using density estimation applied to simulated data realizations to produce an alternative to the incomplete approach, complete the incompletely specified approach, and show that estimation error in the assumed covariance matrix cannot always be ignored.
      0 references
      approximate Bayesian computation using density estimation
      0 references
      mean squared error
      0 references
      Peelle's puzzle
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references