Alternatives to the least squares solution to Peelle's pertinent puzzle (Q1736483)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Alternatives to the least squares solution to Peelle's pertinent puzzle |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7042101
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Alternatives to the least squares solution to Peelle's pertinent puzzle |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7042101 |
Statements
Alternatives to the least squares solution to Peelle's pertinent puzzle (English)
0 references
26 March 2019
0 references
Summary: Peelle's Pertinent Puzzle (PPP) was described in 1987 in the context of estimating fundamental parameters that arise in nuclear interaction experiments. In PPP, generalized least squares (GLS) parameter estimates fell outside the range of the data, which has raised concerns that GLS is somehow flawed and has led to suggested alternatives to GLS estimators. However, there have been no corresponding performance comparisons among methods, and one suggested approach involving simulated data realizations is statistically incomplete. Here we provide performance comparisons among estimators, introduce approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) using density estimation applied to simulated data realizations to produce an alternative to the incomplete approach, complete the incompletely specified approach, and show that estimation error in the assumed covariance matrix cannot always be ignored.
0 references
approximate Bayesian computation using density estimation
0 references
mean squared error
0 references
Peelle's puzzle
0 references
0.9016950130462646
0 references
0.6494441032409668
0 references