On the double-affine Bruhat order: the $\varepsilon =1$ conjecture and classification of covers in ADE type (Q1740603)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    On the double-affine Bruhat order: the $\varepsilon =1$ conjecture and classification of covers in ADE type
    scientific article

      Statements

      On the double-affine Bruhat order: the $\varepsilon =1$ conjecture and classification of covers in ADE type (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      30 April 2019
      0 references
      For any Kac-Moody group $G$, the authors prove that the Bruhat order on the semidirect product $W_{\mathcal{T}} = \mathcal{T} \rtimes W$ of the Weyl group $W$ and the Tits cone $\mathcal{T}$ for $G$ is strictly compatible with a $\mathbb{Z}$-valued length function. In the proof, the inversion sets play an important role. For a positive root $\beta \in G$ and for an integer $n\in \mathbb{Z}$, there is an associated reflection element $s_{\beta[n]}$. In general $s_{\beta[n]} \notin W_{\mathcal{T}}$. For suitable $x\in W_{\mathcal{T}}$ with $xs_{\beta[n]}\in W_{\mathcal{T}}$, they construct an inversion set $\mathrm{Inv}_{x}^{++}(s_{\beta[n]})$ and prove that $xs_{\beta[n]}>x$ if and only if $\mathrm{Inv}_{x}^{++}(s_{\beta[n]})$. In particular, they prove that if $xs_{\beta[n]}>x$ then $l(xs_{\beta[n]})-l(x)=\#(\mathrm{Inv}_{x}^{++}(s_{\beta[n]}))$, where $l:W_{\mathcal{T}}\rightarrow \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}\varepsilon\rightarrow \mathbb{Z}$ is the composed length function obtained by setting $\varepsilon=1$. \par Then, they consider the question that for $x,y\in W_{\mathcal{T}}$ whether $y$ covers $x$ if and only if $x<y$ and $l(x)=l(y)-1$. They answer this question positively when $G$ is untwisted affine ADE type. For this type, using explicit control of the pairings between roots and coroots, they reduce the problem to a calculation that is essentially the case of affine $\mathrm{SL}_2$, where they verify this situation by explicit computations.
      0 references
      Kac-Moody groups
      0 references
      double-affine Bruhat order
      0 references

      Identifiers