\(F\)-signature of pairs and the asymptotic behavior of Frobenius splittings (Q1759376)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    \(F\)-signature of pairs and the asymptotic behavior of Frobenius splittings
    scientific article

      Statements

      \(F\)-signature of pairs and the asymptotic behavior of Frobenius splittings (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      20 November 2012
      0 references
      Throughout \((R,\mathfrak{m},k)\) will denote a commutative Noetherian local ring with unit, and having characteristic \(p > 0\). Let \(F^e:R \to R\) denote the \(e\)-th iteration of the Frobenius endomorphism. In this article, the authors investigate the natural question: ``How many splittings does the \(e\)-th iterated Frobenius map have for \(e \gg 0\)?'' Let \(M\) be an \(R\)-module, viewing \(M\) as an \(R\)-module via restriction of scalars for \(F^e\) yields an \(R\)-module denoted by \(F^e_* M\). Also, let \(J \subseteq R\) be an \textit{\(F\)-compatible} ideal, i.e. an ideal such that for any \(e \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}\) and any \(\varphi \in \) Hom\(_R(F^e_*R,R)\) there is an induced map \(\varphi_J \in \Hom_{R/J}(F^e_*(R/J),R/J)\) (equivalently \(\varphi(F^e_*J) \subseteq J\) for all \(e\) and all \(\varphi\) as above). Then any \(F\)-splitting of \(R\) induces an \(F\)-splitting of \(R/J\). Although, not every \(F\)-splitting of \(R/J\) arises in this way in general, hence one has to enumerate only certain kinds of \(F\)-splittings, and this leads the authors to consider Cartier subalgebras of \(R\). Suppose \(R\) is \(F\)-finite (i.e. \(F_*R\) is a finite \(R\)-module), and for all \(e \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}\) let \(\mathcal{C}^R_e = \Hom_R(F^e_*R,R)\) denote the set of all \(p^{-e}\)-linear maps, and set \(\mathcal{C}^R = \bigoplus_{e \geq 0} \mathcal{C}^R_e\). A \textit{Cartier subalgebra on \(R\)} is a graded \(\mathbb{F}_p\)-subalgebra \(\mathcal{D}\) of \(\mathcal{C}^R\) such that \(\mathcal{C}_0 = \mathcal{D}_0 = R\) and \(\mathcal{D}_e \neq 0\) for some \(e \in \mathbb{Z}_{>0}\). Let \(a_e^\mathcal{D}\) denote the maximal number of \(F\)-splittings contained in \(\mathcal{D}_e\). The main result of the article is the following: Set \(\Gamma_\mathcal{D} = \{e \;| \;a_e^\mathcal{D} \neq 0\}\) and \(\alpha(R) = \text{log}_p[k:k^p]\). Then the limit \[ \displaystyle s(R,\mathcal{D}) = \lim_{e \in \Gamma_\mathcal{D} \to \infty} \frac{a_e^{\mathcal{D}}}{p^{e(d+\alpha(R))}} \] exists and is called the \(F\)-signature of \((R,\mathcal{D})\). Furthermore \(s(R,\mathcal{D})\) is positive if and only if \((R,\mathcal{D})\) is \(F\)-regular, i.e. for all \(c \in R\) not contained in any minimal prime, there exists \(e \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}\) and \(\varphi \in \mathcal{D}_e\) such that \(\varphi(F^e_*c) = 1\). \(F\)-signature of a ring was first introduced by \textit{C. Huneke} and \textit{G. J. Leuschke} in [Math.Ann. 324, No. 2, 391-404 (2002; Zbl 1007.13005)]. The existence part in this theorem recovers and generalizes the existence results of the third author [Invent. Math. 190, No. 3, 743--765 (2012; Zbl 1271.13012)]. The positivity part vastly generalizes the work of \textit{I. M. Aberbach} and \textit{G. J. Leuschke} [Math. Res. Lett. 10, No. 1, 51--56 (2003; Zbl 1070.13006)]. The authors also focus their attention on the \(F\)-splitting ratio (defined here in the more general setting of Cartier subalgebras): \[ \displaystyle r_F(R,\mathcal{D}) = \lim_{e \in \Gamma_\mathcal{D} \to \infty} \frac{a_e^{\mathcal{D}}}{p^{e(\dim(R/P_{\mathcal{D}})+\alpha(R))}} \] exists and it is positive when \(R\) is \(F\)-pure (i.e. when there is a surjective homomorphism \(\varphi \in \mathcal{D}_e\) for some \(e \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}\)). Here \(P_\mathcal{D}\) is the \(F\)-splitting prime of \(R\), which was first defined, together with the \(F\)-splitting ratio, in [Math. Z. 250, No. 4, 791--806 (2005; Zbl 1102.13001)] by \textit{I. M. Aberbach} and \textit{F. Enescu}. Finally, exploiting the crucial point that Cartier subalgebras facilitate changing settings from one ring to another, the authors derive some methods to compute explicitly the \(F\)-signature and the \(F\)-splitting ratio, in the spirit of the work of \textit{R. Fedder} [Trans. Ame. Math. Soc. 278, 461--480 (1983; Zbl 0519.13017)], and they provide explicit computations in some interesting examples.
      0 references
      \(F\)-signature
      0 references
      cartier algebra
      0 references
      \(F\)-pure
      0 references
      \(F\)-regular
      0 references
      splitting prime
      0 references
      \(F\)-splitting ratio
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references