Analysis of a third-order absorbing boundary condition for the Schrödinger equation discretized in space. (Q1764493)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2138569
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Analysis of a third-order absorbing boundary condition for the Schrödinger equation discretized in space.
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2138569

      Statements

      Analysis of a third-order absorbing boundary condition for the Schrödinger equation discretized in space. (English)
      0 references
      25 February 2005
      0 references
      A Schrödinger type equation of the form \[ \partial_t u = -{i \over c} ( \partial^2_x u +V u) \] for \(x\in \mathbb R,\;t>0\) and with \(c>0, V \in \mathbb R\) is considered especially from the numerical point of view. For obtaining the reliable numerical solution by space discretization a finite spatial subdomain must be used with appropriate boundary conditions. One of the wide spread techniques is to use local boundary conditions (ABC) obtained by approximation the transparent, or reflection free, boundary conditions (TBC). ABC boundary conditions are obtained by interpolatory techniques and usually are denoted as \(ABC(j_1,j_2)\) when \(j_1+j_2+1\) interpolatory nodes are used. It was proved in previous papers that the matrices associated with \(ABC(1,0)\) as well \(ABC(1,1)\) have all eigenvalues with negative real part and the semidiscrete problem is weak ill-posed when the spatial step size \(h\) goes to zero. A semidiscrete alternative to these ABC was developed denoted by \(SABC(j_1,j_2)\). Similar properties as \(ABC(1,1)\) for \(SABC(1,1)\), that means weakly ill-posed, are proved in this paper. The essential difference is in the possibility to use bigger values of the spatial discretiazation in order to obtain a certain absorption, what is important because of the weak instability of both problems. Stability of the matrix for the resulting semidiscrete problem obtained for \(SABC(1,1)\) is proved and a bound for the possible growth of the norm of the solution is obtained.
      0 references
      semidiscretization
      0 references
      absorbing boundary conditions
      0 references
      well posedness
      0 references
      Schrödinger-type equation
      0 references
      stability
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references