Upper bounds for spatial point process approximations (Q1774190)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Upper bounds for spatial point process approximations
    scientific article

      Statements

      Upper bounds for spatial point process approximations (English)
      0 references
      29 April 2005
      0 references
      Let \(D_1\), \(D_2\in \mathbb N=\{1,2,3,...\}\) and \(D=D_1 + D_2\). Consider a point process \(\xi\) on \(\mathbb R^D=\mathbb R^{D_1}\times \mathbb R^{D_2}\), which has expectation measure \(\nu\) and meets three conditions, namely, 1) absolute continuity of \(\nu\) with a mild restriction on the density; 2) an orderliness condition in the \(\mathbb R^{D_1}\)-directions [for a detailed account of orderliness, see \textit{D. J. Daley}, in: Stochastic Geometry, Tribute Memory Rollo Davidson, 148-161 (1974; Zbl 0285.60039)]; 3) a mixing condition in the \(\mathbb R^{D_2}\)- directions. The various versions of the third condition are mixing conditions of different strength [see \textit{P. Doukhan}, ``Mixing: Properties and examples'' (1994; Zbl 0801.60027)]. Let \(\eta\) be a Poisson process with the same expectation measure and let \(\theta_T: \mathbb R^D\to \mathbb R^D\) be the linear transformation that stretches the first \(D_1\) coordinates by a factor \(\omega(T)^{1/D_1}\) and compresses the last \(D_2\) coordinates by a factor \(T^{1/D_2}\). Consider restrictions of transformed processes \(\xi \theta_T^{-1}\) and \(\eta \theta_T^{-1}\) to a bounded cube \(J=[-1, 1)^D\). It was shown by \textit{S. P. Ellis} [Adv. Appl. Probab. 18, 646--659 (1986; Zbl 0609.60059)] that, for bounded measurable functions \(f_T: J\to \mathbb R\) with \(\| f_T\| = O(\sqrt{\omega(T)/T})\), the difference between characteristic functions of \(\int_Jf_td(\xi\theta_T^{-1})\) and \(\int_Jf_td(\eta \theta_T^{-1})\) converges uniformly to zero on every compact subset of \(\mathbb R\) as \(T\to \infty\). Therefore, there is hope that \(d({\mathcal L}(\xi\theta_T^{-1}| _J), {\mathcal L}(\eta\theta_T^{-1}| _J))\) can be shown to be small for large \(T\) if we choose for \(d\) a probability distance between distributions of point processes which metrizes a topology that is equal to or not too much finer than the weak topology (i.e., the topology of convergence in distribution). It was shown by \textit{A. D. Barbour, L. Holst}, and \textit{S. Janson} [``Poisson approximation'' (1992; Zbl 0746.60002)] that \(d\) should be \(d_2\)-distance which can be defined by the formula \(d_2(P, Q) := \sup_{f\in F_2}\left| \int f\, dP - \int f\, dQ\right| \), where \(P\) and \(Q\) are probability measures on \(\mathcal M\), \(\mathcal M\) is the space of point measures on a compact set \(\mathcal X\), \(F_2\) is a certain class of functions determined on \(\mathcal M\). In the present article under the above mentioned conditions \(1)-3)\), explicit upper bounds are given for the \(d_2\)-distance between the corresponding point process distributions. A number of related results, and applications to kernel density estimation and long range dependence testing are also presented.
      0 references
      Poisson process approximation
      0 references
      Stein's method
      0 references
      density estimation
      0 references
      total variation distance
      0 references

      Identifiers