Full groups of Cantor minimal systems (Q1806268)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Full groups of Cantor minimal systems
scientific article

    Statements

    Full groups of Cantor minimal systems (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    23 August 2000
    0 references
    For a dynamical system \((X,\phi)\) on the compact Hausdorff space \(X\), the associated full group \([\phi]\) is the subgroup of all homeomorphisms \(\gamma\) of \(X\) such that \(\gamma(x)\in \text{Orb}_\phi(x)\) (the \(\phi\)-orbit of \(x\)) for all \(x\in X\). In the particular case of a Cantor minimal system (i.e. \(\phi\) is a minimal homeomorphism of a Cantor set \(X\)), the authors obtain an analogue of Krieger's theorem [\textit{W. Krieger}, Math. Ann. 252, 87-95 (1980; Zbl 0472.54028)] which characterizes the topological orbit equivalence of two minimal homeomorphisms on a Cantor set \(X\). In this paper, the full group \([\phi]\) of a Cantor minimal system \((X,\phi)\) is defined; namely a homeomorphism \(\psi\) of \(X\) belongs to \([\phi]\) if \(\psi(x)= \phi(x)^{n(x)}\), \(n(x)\in \mathbb{Z}\) for all \(x\in X\). The topological full group \(\tau[\phi]\) of \((X,\phi)\) is the subgroup of \([\phi]\) consisting in the homeomorphisms whose associated orbit cocycle \(n(x)\) is continuous. Following Dye's definition [\textit{H. A. Dye}, Am. J. Math. 85, 551-576 (1963; Zbl 0191.42803)], for an open set \({\mathcal O}\in X\) and for \(\Gamma\) the full group (i), or the topological full group (ii), or a minimal AF-system (iii), the local subgroup \(\Gamma_{\mathcal O}\) of \(\Gamma\) is defined by \(\Gamma_{\mathcal O}= \{\gamma\in\Gamma\); \(\gamma(x)= x\), for all \(x\in{\mathcal O}^c\}\). In Section 3, the local subgroups \(\Gamma_U\) for \(U\) a clopen subset of \(X\) is algebraically characterized. In Section 4, the results of the preceeding section are used to prove the following result: Theorem. Let \((X_1,\phi_1)\) and \((X_2,\phi_2)\) be Cantor minimal systems. (i) \((X_1,\phi_1)\) and \((X_2,\phi_2)\) are orbit if and only if \([\phi_1]\) and \([\phi_2]\) are isomorphic. (ii) \((X_1,\phi_1)\) and \((X_2,\phi_2)\) are flip-conjugate if and only if \(\tau[\phi_1]\) and \(\tau[\phi_2]\) are isomorphic. (iii) \((X_1,\phi_1)\) and \((X_2,\phi_2)\) are strong orbit equivalent if and only if \(\tau[\phi_1]_{y_1}\) and \(\tau[\phi_2]_{y_2}\) are isomorphic for any \(y_i\in X_i\), \(i= 1,2\). (For \(y\in X\), \(\tau[\phi]_y\) denotes the subgroup of \(\gamma\in \tau[\phi]\) such that \(\gamma(\text{orb}^+_\phi(y))= \text{Orb}^+_\phi(y)\), where \(\text{Orb}^+_\phi(y)\) is the forward \(\phi\)-orbit of \(y\).) In Section 5, the authors show that, up to normalization, there exists only one non-trivial homomorphism from \(\tau[\phi]\) to \(\mathbb{Z}\) called the index map, the kernel of which is a complete algebraic invariant of flip-conjugacy of a Cantor minimal system \((X,\phi)\).
    0 references
    0 references
    dynamical system
    0 references
    full group
    0 references
    Cantor minimal system
    0 references
    Krieger's theorem
    0 references
    complete algebraic invariant flip-conjugacy
    0 references
    0 references