Reconsidering a scientific revolution: the case of Einstein versus Lorentz (Q1811292)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Reconsidering a scientific revolution: the case of Einstein versus Lorentz |
scientific article |
Statements
Reconsidering a scientific revolution: the case of Einstein versus Lorentz (English)
0 references
28 October 2003
0 references
The author of the study under review, Michael Janssen (Univ. of Minnesota), parallels the scientific debate between Albert Einstein and Hendrik A. Lorentz with that between Copernicus and Ptolemy. Knowledge of Lorentz' ether theory may be understood and explained better if considering his ideas and interpretations on invariance. It is known that Lorentz's theory represents a combination between Newtonian mechanics and Maxwellian electrodynamics. From Newton, Lorentz took over the space-time arena and the laws of motion. On the other hand, Einstein's special theory of relativity (first discussed in his ``On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'') seems to have similar concerns with the scientific interests of Lorentz. The opposition between them may be expressed as: \textit{constructive theory} and \textit{theory of principle}.
0 references
relativity
0 references
ether theory
0 references
invariance
0 references
Einstein
0 references
Lorentz
0 references
empirical equivalence
0 references