Reconsidering a scientific revolution: the case of Einstein versus Lorentz (Q1811292)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1925630
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Reconsidering a scientific revolution: the case of Einstein versus Lorentz
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1925630

      Statements

      Reconsidering a scientific revolution: the case of Einstein versus Lorentz (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      28 October 2003
      0 references
      The author of the study under review, Michael Janssen (Univ. of Minnesota), parallels the scientific debate between Albert Einstein and Hendrik A. Lorentz with that between Copernicus and Ptolemy. Knowledge of Lorentz' ether theory may be understood and explained better if considering his ideas and interpretations on invariance. It is known that Lorentz's theory represents a combination between Newtonian mechanics and Maxwellian electrodynamics. From Newton, Lorentz took over the space-time arena and the laws of motion. On the other hand, Einstein's special theory of relativity (first discussed in his ``On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'') seems to have similar concerns with the scientific interests of Lorentz. The opposition between them may be expressed as: \textit{constructive theory} and \textit{theory of principle}.
      0 references
      relativity
      0 references
      ether theory
      0 references
      invariance
      0 references
      Einstein
      0 references
      Lorentz
      0 references
      empirical equivalence
      0 references

      Identifiers