Mixed matrices and binomial ideals (Q1815301)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Mixed matrices and binomial ideals
scientific article

    Statements

    Mixed matrices and binomial ideals (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    22 June 1997
    0 references
    Write \(u\in\mathbb{Z}^n\) as \(u=u^+-u^-\) with nonnegative integral \(u^+\), \(u^-\) of disjoint support. Define the binomial \(f_u=X^{u^+} -X^{u^-}\in\mathbb{Z}[X] =\mathbb{Z}[X_1, \dots,X_n]\). Given \(u_1,\dots, u_r\in\mathbb{Z}^n\) consider the matrix \(M\) having the \(u_i\) as row vectors and the ideals \(I=\langle f_{u_1}, \dots, f_{u_r}\rangle\), \(I^*=\langle f_u:u\in\text{span}_\mathbb{Z} (u_1, \dots,u_r)\rangle\), \(\hat I=\langle f_u:u\in\text{span}_\mathbb{Q} (u_1,\dots,u_r) \cap\mathbb{Z}^n\rangle\). The relations and properties of these binomial ideals are studied in terms of the properties of \(M\). A real matrix is mixed if all rows contain positive and negative entries; it is dominating if it does not contain a square mixed submatrix. A certain simple algorithm produces from a real matrix a submatrix that the authors call derived; all its nonzero rows are mixed. Here a selection of results of Sections 2,3. Theorem 2.3: The height of ideal \(I\) equals \(r-\max\{0,s-t\): The derived of \(M\) contains a mixed \(s\times t\) submatrix\}; Corollary 2.4: A criterion for when \(f_{u_1}, \dots,f_{u_r}\) is a regular sequence. Corollary 2.8: Mixed dominating matrices are \(L\)-matrices in the sense of [\textit{R. A. Brualdi}, \textit{K. L. Chavey}, \textit{B. L. Shader}, Linear Algebra Appl. 196, 37-61 (1994; Zbl 0789.15026)]. Theorem 2.9: If \(M\) is dominating of linearly independent rows, then \(I=I^*\); if even content \((M)=1\), then \(I=I^*=\hat I\). Corollary 2.10: A criterion for a finitely generated subsemigroup \(S\) of \(\mathbb{Z}^n\) in order that \(\mathbb{Z}[t^s: s\in S]\) is a complete intersection. This uses results of [\textit{K. G. Fischer}, \textit{J. Shapiro}, Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math. 151, 111-130 (1993; Zbl 0792.13008)] and [\textit{J. Herzog}, Manuscr. Math. 3, 175-193 (1970; Zbl 0211.33801)]. Proposition 3.1: An \(r\times (r+1)\) matrix is an \(S\)-matrix in the sense of [\textit{R. A. Brualdi}, \textit{B. L. Shader}, Cambridge Tracts in Math. 116 (1995; Zbl 0833.15002)] and [\textit{V. Klee}, Linear Algebra Appl. 96, 233-247 (1987; Zbl 0628.65034)] iff it is mixed dominating. Theorem 3.5: \textit{C. Delorme}'s [Ann. sci. Ecole norm. sup., IV. Ser. 9, 145-154 (1976; Zbl 0325.20065)] criterion for when is \(\mathbb{Z}[t^s:s\in S]\) a complete intersection, \(S\subset\mathbb{N}\) being a numerical semigroup. The paper draws also on a paper of \textit{D. Eisenbud} and \textit{B. Sturmfels} [Duke Math. J. 84, No. 1, 1-45 (1996)].
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    binomial ideals
    0 references
    height of ideal
    0 references
    regular sequence
    0 references
    complete intersection
    0 references
    mixed matrix
    0 references
    content of integer matrix
    0 references
    sign-solvable
    0 references
    \(S\)-matrix
    0 references
    \(L\)-matrix
    0 references
    numerical semigroup
    0 references
    0 references