Deducing planning variables from experimental arm trajectories: Pitfalls and possibilities (Q1820734)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3995509
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Deducing planning variables from experimental arm trajectories: Pitfalls and possibilities
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3995509

      Statements

      Deducing planning variables from experimental arm trajectories: Pitfalls and possibilities (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      1987
      0 references
      This paper investigates whether endpoint Cartesian variables or joint variables better describe the planning of human arm movements. For each of the two sets of planning variables, a coordination strategy of linear interpolation is chosen to generate possible trajectories, which are to be compared against experimental trajectories for best match. Joint interpolation generates curved endpoint trajectories called N- leaved roses. Endpoint Cartesian interpolation generates curved joint trajectories, which however can be qualitatively characterized by joint reversal points. Though these two sets of planning variables ordinarily lead to distinct predictions under linear interpolation, three situations are pointed out where the two strategies may be confused.
      0 references
      biological motor control
      0 references
      Cartesian variables
      0 references
      joint variables
      0 references
      planning of human arm movements
      0 references
      linear interpolation
      0 references
      N-leaved roses
      0 references

      Identifiers