The ``automatic'' robustness of minimum distance functionals (Q1825558)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The ``automatic'' robustness of minimum distance functionals
scientific article

    Statements

    The ``automatic'' robustness of minimum distance functionals (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1988
    0 references
    If \(\{P_{\theta}\}\) is a model indexed by real parameter \(\theta\) and \(\mu\) is a metric between probabilities then the minimum distance (MD) functional \({\hat \theta}\)(P) is a solution of \(\mu (P,P_{{\hat \theta}})=\min_{\theta}\mu (P,P_{\theta}).\) The authors show that the functional is very stable with respect to the quantity being estimated in the following sense. Denote by \(\delta\) a measure of distortion of an ideal distribution \(P_ 0\) and define the bias distortion curve for a functional T to be \[ b(\epsilon)=\sup \{| T(P)-T(P_ 0)|:\quad \delta (P,P_ 0)\leq \epsilon \}. \] The slope \(\gamma^*\) of b(\(\epsilon)\) at zero can be sometimes interpreted as the gross error sensitivity while \(\epsilon^*\) is equal to the smallest \(\epsilon\) such that the graph of b has no singularities in the ball of radius \(\leq \epsilon\) as the break down point of T. The basic proposition of the paper claims that whenever the distortion measure \(\delta =\mu\) then for the MD functionals based on \(\mu\) we have \(b_ 0(\epsilon)\leq b(\epsilon)\leq b_ 0(2\epsilon),\) where \[ b_ 0(\epsilon)=\sup \{| \theta -\theta_ 0|:\quad \mu (P_{\theta},P_ 0)\}. \] This then implies \(\gamma^*(\theta)<2 \inf_{T} \gamma^*(T)\) and \(\epsilon^*(\theta)>\sup_{T} \epsilon^*(T)/2\), where the inf and sup are taken over Fisher consistent T. Thus the MD functional is shown to have within a factor of 2 the smallest sensitivity and the best breakdown point among Fisher consistent functionals. These statements are then improved for Hilbertian distances and invariant cases. Generalizations are given for multidimensional parameter models, semiparametric models and minimum discrepancy functionals. Also consistency and finite sample robustness of MD estimators are studied.
    0 references
    0 references
    minimum distance functional
    0 references
    quantitative robustness
    0 references
    gross-error sensitivity
    0 references
    breakdown point
    0 references
    Kolmogorov
    0 references
    Lévy
    0 references
    Prokhorov
    0 references
    variation
    0 references
    Hellinger distances
    0 references
    Cramér-von Mises discrepancy
    0 references
    bias distortion curve
    0 references
    break down point
    0 references
    distortion measure
    0 references
    Fisher consistent functionals
    0 references
    multidimensional parameter models
    0 references
    semiparametric models
    0 references
    minimum discrepancy functionals
    0 references
    consistency
    0 references
    finite sample robustness
    0 references
    0 references