Boundaries of Teichmüller spaces and end-invariants for hyperbolic 3-manifolds (Q1847804)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Boundaries of Teichmüller spaces and end-invariants for hyperbolic 3-manifolds
scientific article

    Statements

    Boundaries of Teichmüller spaces and end-invariants for hyperbolic 3-manifolds (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    27 October 2002
    0 references
    In boundaries for the Teichmüller space due to Bers and Thurston, geodesic laminations arise in natural ways. A point \(M\) in Bers's boundary, a hyperbolic 3-manifold, has an associated geodesic lamination \(\mathcal E(M)\) that is pinched. The lamination \(\mathcal E(M)\) is an invariant of the quasi-isometry class \([M]\) of \(M\). A point \([\mu]\) in Thurston's boundary, a measured lamination \(\mu\) up to scale, records the asymptotic stretching of divergent hyperbolic metrics \(X_t\to [\mu]\). Its support \(|\mu|\) is a geodesic lamination. Thurston's ending lamination conjecture predicts that the map \([M]\mapsto\mathcal E(M)\) from quasi-isometry classes in Bers's boundary to the quotient of Thurston's boundary by forgetting the measure is an injection. In other words, if one knows the lamination \(\mathcal E(M)\), one knows the manifold \(M\) up to quasi-isometry. The map \(\mathcal E\) gives a bijection between dense subsets; the dense family of maximal cusps \(M\) is mapped by \(\mathcal E\) to the dense set of maximal partitions of \(S\) by simple closed curves. Thus, given Thurston's conjecture, it is natural to ask whether \(\mathcal E\) is a homeomorphism. Or, how do sequences \(\mathcal E(M_n)\) behave under limits \(M_n\to M\)? Let \(S\) be an oriented compact topological surface of negative Euler characteristic with nonempty boundary. The author shows that \(\mathcal E\) has the following continuity properties: the map \(\mathcal E\) is a surjection onto the subset of laminations that relatively fill \(S\); when \(\text{dim}_\mathbb C(\text{Teich}(S))>1\), \(\mathcal E\) is strictly lower-semicontinuous in the quotient topologies; \(\mathcal E\) is continuous in a new end-invariant topology, based on the Hausdorff topology, which predicts new information about its limiting values; \(\mathcal E\) cannot have a continuous inverse in the end-invariant topology, nor do Hausdorff limits completely encode the limiting end-invariant in general.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    boundaries for the Teichmüller space
    0 references
    measured geodesic lamination
    0 references
    Thurston's boundary
    0 references
    surjectivity onto measurable lamination
    0 references
    maximal cusps
    0 references
    Bers boundary
    0 references
    quotient topology
    0 references
    subsurfaces
    0 references
    pleated surfaces
    0 references
    lengths of laminations
    0 references
    decomposing laminations
    0 references
    pinching deformation
    0 references
    lower-semicontinuity
    0 references
    spinning maximal cusps
    0 references
    continuity in the end-invariant topology
    0 references
    convergence in a Bers compactification
    0 references
    constructing partitions
    0 references
    failure of Hausdorff topology
    0 references
    implicit cusps
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references