Comparison of non-commutative 2- and \(p\)-summing operators from \(B(l_2)\) into \(OH\) (Q1848666)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1827607
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Comparison of non-commutative 2- and \(p\)-summing operators from \(B(l_2)\) into \(OH\)
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1827607

      Statements

      Comparison of non-commutative 2- and \(p\)-summing operators from \(B(l_2)\) into \(OH\) (English)
      0 references
      11 September 2003
      0 references
      Summary: In the theory of \(p\)-summing operators studied by Pietsch we know that \[ \pi_2(C(K),H)= \pi_p(C(K), H) \] for any Hilbert space \(H\) and any \(p\) such that \(2<p<+ \infty\). In this paper, we prove that this equality is not true for the same notion generalized by Junge and Pisier to operator spaces, i.e., \(\pi_{l_2} (B(l_2),OH) (=\pi_2^0(B(l_2),OH)) \neq\pi_{l_p} (B(l_2), OH)\).
      0 references
      operator spaces
      0 references
      completely bounded operators
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references