Higher relative class number formulae (Q1849476)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Higher relative class number formulae
scientific article

    Statements

    Higher relative class number formulae (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1 December 2002
    0 references
    Let \(E\) be a totally complex Abelian number field with maximal real subfield \(F\), \(\chi\) the nontrivial character of Gal\((E/F).\) Then \(\zeta_{E} (s) = \zeta_{F} (s) \ldotp L (E/F, \chi, s)\) and the well-known relative class number formula reads: \[ L(E/F, \chi, 0)= {2^{r_{1}} \over Q} {h^{-} \over w(E)}, \] where \(r_{1} = [ F : \mathbb Q],\) \(h^{-}\) is the relative class number, \(w(E)\) is the number of roots of unity in \(E\) and the \(Q\)-index is defined as \(Q = [{\mathcal O}^{\ast}_{E} : {\mathcal O}^{\ast}_{F} \ldotp \mu (E)] = 1\) or 2. Similar to the classical case \(n = 1,\) the special value \(L(E/F, \chi, 1-n)\) at \(1-n\) for odd \(n \geq 3\) is given here by a relative class number formula of the form: \[ L(E/F, \chi, 1-n) = \pm {2^{r_{1}+1} \over Q_{n}} \ldotp {h^{-}_{n} \over w_{n}(E)}, \] where \(w_{n} (E) = |H^{0} (E, \mathbb Q/\mathbb Z (n))|,\) \(Q_{n}\) is a higher \(Q\)-index, equal to 1 or 2, and \(h^{-}_{n} = {h_{n}(E) \over h_{n}(F)},\) \(h_{n}(L)\) denoting the order of the finite group \(H^{2} ({\mathcal O}_{L}, \mathbb Z(n)) := \Pi_{p} H^{2}_{\text{ét}}\) (spec \({\mathcal O}_{L} [1/p], \mathbb Z_{p}(n)).\) The proof consists in comparing the \(p\)-adic valuation on both sides for each prime \(p.\) For odd \(p,\) this is an immediate consequence of the Main Conjecture (= Wiles' theorem) of Iwasawa theory. For \(p = 2,\) there are two difficulties: the Main Conjecture is so far only proved for \(\mathbb Q\) (hence the restriction to absolutely Abelian number fields); in order to control contributions from real infinite primes, another ingredient, the so-called ``totally positive cohomology'' (Bruno Kahn), is needed. These difficulties suggest that in such statements on special values of \(L\)-functions as the Lichtenbaum conjectures, \(K\)-theory should be replaced by motivic cohomology.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    higher class number
    0 references
    \(K\)-groups
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references