Partition subalgebras for maximal almost disjoint families (Q1849859)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Partition subalgebras for maximal almost disjoint families
scientific article

    Statements

    Partition subalgebras for maximal almost disjoint families (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    2 December 2002
    0 references
    Let \({\mathcal M}\) be a maximal almost disjoint family on \(\omega\). A partitioner of \({\mathcal M}\) is a set \(A\subseteq\omega\) such that the sets \({\mathcal X}=\{M\in {\mathcal M}:M \subseteq^*A\}\) and \({\mathcal Y}=\{M\in {\mathcal M}:M\cap A=^* \emptyset\}\) form a partition of \({\mathcal M}\). The set of all partitioners of \({\mathcal M}\) forms a Boolean algebra \({\mathcal A}\). Let \(I_{\mathcal M}\) denote the ideal in \({\mathcal A}\) which is generated by \({\mathcal M}\) together with the finite subsets of \(\omega\). The partitioner algebra \(P_{\mathcal M}\) of \({\mathcal M}\) is the quotient algebra \({\mathcal A}/I_{\mathcal M}\). A Boolean algebra is representable if it is isomorphic to a partitioner algebra of some mad family on \(\omega\). Previously, \textit{J. E. Baumgartner} and \textit{M. Weese} [``Partition algebras for almost disjoint families'', Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 274, 619-630 (1982; Zbl 0515.03032)] asked if every subalgebra of a representable algebra is also representable. It is known that the answer is yes under CH. Here the authors show that the existence of a supercompact cardinal implies that it is consistent that the answer is no. The proof uses \(\text{PFA}^+\) and \(\diamondsuit (S^2_0)\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    consistency
    0 references
    maximal almost disjoint family
    0 references
    Boolean algebra
    0 references
    partitioner algebra
    0 references
    representable algebra
    0 references