On holomorphic functions of uniformly bounded type on tensor products (Q1879075)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On holomorphic functions of uniformly bounded type on tensor products |
scientific article |
Statements
On holomorphic functions of uniformly bounded type on tensor products (English)
0 references
22 September 2004
0 references
Given locally convex spaces \(E\) and \(F\), \({\mathcal H}(E,F)\) denotes the space of all holomorphic functions from \(E\) into \(F\). Certain subspaces of \({\mathcal H}(E,F)\) arise naturally. Among these are \({\mathcal H}_b(E,F)\), the space of \(f\) in \({\mathcal H}(E,F)\) which are bounded on bounded subsets of \(E\), and \({\mathcal H}_{ub}(E,F)\), the space of all \(f\) in \({\mathcal H}(E,F)\) which are bounded on all multiples of some neighbourhood of \(0\). In general, \({\mathcal H}_{ub}(E,F)\subseteq {\mathcal H}_b(E,F)\subseteq {\mathcal H}(E,F)\). This paper is concerned with determining conditions on Fréchet or DF spaces \(E\), \(F\) and \(G\) that will ensure \({\mathcal H}_b(G\hat\otimes_\pi E,F)={\mathcal H}_{ub}(G\hat\otimes_\pi E,F)\). These conditions are in terms of the linear topological invariants \((\widetilde\Omega)\), \((\overline{\overline{\Omega}})\), \((LB^\infty)\), \((DN)\), \((\overline{DN})\) and \((\underline{DN})\) of \textit{D. Vogt} [J. Reine Angew. Math. 345, 182--200 (1983; Zbl 0514.46003), Manuscr. Math. 37, 269--301 (1982; Zbl 0512.46003)]. The author shows that (a) given a Banach space \(G\), a Fréchet space \(F\) and a quasi-normable Fréchet space \(E\) with an absolute Schauder basis, then \({\mathcal H}_b(G\hat\otimes_\pi E,F) ={\mathcal H}_{ub}(G\hat\otimes_\pi E,F)\) if (i) \(E\) has \((\widetilde\Omega)\) and \(F\) has \((DN)\), or (ii) \(E\) has \((\overline{\overline{\Omega}})\) and \(F\) has \((\underline{DN})\), (b) given a Fréchet space \(E\), a Fréchet-Montel space \(F\) such that \(F'\) has an absolute basis and a Fréchet space \(G\) with \((\widetilde\Omega)\), then \({\mathcal H}_b(G\hat\otimes_\pi F',E') ={\mathcal H}_{ub}(G\hat\otimes_\pi F',E')\) if (i) \(E\) has \((LB^\infty)\) and \(F\) has \((\overline{DN})\), (ii) \(E\) has \((\widetilde\Omega)\) and \(F\) has \((DN)\), or (iii) \(E\) has \((\overline{\overline{\Omega}})\) and \(F\) has \((\underline{DN})\). (c) if \(E\) is a Fréchet space and \(F\) is a Fréchet-Montel space, then \({\mathcal H}_b(F',E')={\mathcal H}_{ub}(F',E')\) if \(E\) has \((\widetilde\Omega)\) and \(F\) has \((DN)\). This paper contains a number of serious misprints and errors. The first is that the definition of \((\widetilde\Omega)\) given by the author is incorrect. Secondly, in Lemma~4.2 it is not entirely clear which assumptions the author has made about the spaces \(E\) and \(F\). Finally, the author assumes that each point \(z\) in \(\overline{\text{conv}}(U\otimes V_\beta)\), the closed convex hull of \(U\) and \(V_\beta\), has a representation of the form \(z=\sum_{j=1}^\infty\lambda_j x_j\otimes y_j\) with \((x_j)_j\) in \(U\), \((y_j)_j\) in \(V_\beta\) and \(\sum_{j=1}^\infty| \lambda_j| \leq 1\). Such representations of \(z\) are not always possible. This error is not fatal as the proofs of Theorem~1.1 and Theorem~2.1 can easily be adjusted to allow for this fact.
0 references
holomorphic functions of uniformly bounded type
0 references
linear topological invariants
0 references