Surface approximation is sometimes easier than surface integration (Q1885349)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2111559
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Surface approximation is sometimes easier than surface integration |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2111559 |
Statements
Surface approximation is sometimes easier than surface integration (English)
0 references
28 October 2004
0 references
The paper is devoted to the study of surface approximation and surface integration over a given domain [cf. \textit{A. G. Werschulz} et al., J. Complexity 17, No.2, 442--466 (2001; Zbl 0984.68084) and J. Complexity 18, 660--678 (2002; Zbl 1051.68083)]. It is assumed here that the surfaces are nondegenerate. The foregoing problems are first studied over images of cubes. Finally these results are extended to smooth surfaces defined as oriented cellulated regions or as images of balls. Error for surface approximation problem is measured in the \(L_q \)-sense. Using these results the authors determine when surface approximation is easier than, as easy as, or harder than surface integration.
0 references
surface approximation
0 references
surface integration
0 references
complexity
0 references
optimal algorithms
0 references
0 references
0.83363456
0 references
0.82106507
0 references
0.8195653
0 references
0.81791687
0 references