Surface approximation is sometimes easier than surface integration (Q1885349)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2111559
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Surface approximation is sometimes easier than surface integration
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2111559

      Statements

      Surface approximation is sometimes easier than surface integration (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      28 October 2004
      0 references
      The paper is devoted to the study of surface approximation and surface integration over a given domain [cf. \textit{A. G. Werschulz} et al., J. Complexity 17, No.2, 442--466 (2001; Zbl 0984.68084) and J. Complexity 18, 660--678 (2002; Zbl 1051.68083)]. It is assumed here that the surfaces are nondegenerate. The foregoing problems are first studied over images of cubes. Finally these results are extended to smooth surfaces defined as oriented cellulated regions or as images of balls. Error for surface approximation problem is measured in the \(L_q \)-sense. Using these results the authors determine when surface approximation is easier than, as easy as, or harder than surface integration.
      0 references
      surface approximation
      0 references
      surface integration
      0 references
      complexity
      0 references
      optimal algorithms
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers