Boundedness of Bergman projectors on Siegel domains over polyhedral cones (Q1889441)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Boundedness of Bergman projectors on Siegel domains over polyhedral cones
scientific article

    Statements

    Boundedness of Bergman projectors on Siegel domains over polyhedral cones (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    2 December 2004
    0 references
    The Bergman space \(A_p(D)\) of a domain in \(\mathbb C^n\) is the space of holomorphic functions in \(L^p(D)\). For \(p = 2\), it is a Hilbert space with a reproducing kernel, i.e. there exists a function \(K(z, w)\), holomorphic in \(z\) and antiholomorphic in \(w\), such that \(K(\cdot, w)\in A_2(D)\) for every \(z\in D\) and \(F(z) =\int_D F(w)K(z, w)\,dw\) for every \(F\in A_2(D)\). It is known that for certain domains the Bergman projector, \(Pf(z) =\int_D f(w)K(z, w)\,dw\), is bounded on \(L^p(D)\) for \(1 < p < \infty\). This is the case for the unit disk and the upper half-plane in one complex dimension; in higher dimensions, this is known to be true for various classes of pseudo-convex domains of finite type. Recent work of D.~Békollé and his collaborators has shown that, if \(D = D_\Gamma =\mathbb R^n+i\Gamma\) is the tube domain over a simple symmetric cone \(\Gamma\subset\mathbb R^n\), there is a non-trivial range of \(p\in(1, \infty)\) for which \(P\) is not bounded. The simplest example of these cones is the circular cone in \(\mathbb R^n\) with \(n \geq3\). A partially negative result for these domains is not surprising, because it is well known that the Cauchy-Szegö projection is bounded on \(L^p(\mathbb R^n)\) only for \(p=2\). The non-zero curvature of the boundary of \(\Gamma\) is responsible of these facts: for the Cauchy-Szegö projection, this is a direct consequence of Fefferman's theorem on the ball multiplier. It must be reasonably expected that if \(\Gamma\) is a polyhedral cone, hence with a `flat' boundary, the Bergman projector is bounded on \(L^p(D_\Gamma)\) in the full range \(1 < p < \infty\). This is surely true if \(\Gamma\) is an `octant', i.e. a cartesian product of half-lines, because \(P\) is just the tensor product of Bergman projectors for the upper half-plane. For general polyhedral cones, however, such statement does not seem to be obtainable directly from the `octant' case, by means of a transference argument which works instead for the Cauchy-Szegö projector. In this paper, the authors fill this gap, by proving that the Bergman projector is in fact bounded on \(L^p(D_\Gamma)\) in the full range \(1 < p < \infty\), if \(\Gamma\) is polyhedral. The proof is rather delicate and it requires accurate considerations on the structure of polyhedral cones in general dimensions (the argument would be technically much simpler if restricted, e.g., to 3-dimensional cones). The authors also extend the same result to Siegel domains of type II associated with polyhedral cones.
    0 references
    Bergman space
    0 references
    Bergman kernels
    0 references
    boundedness of the Bergman projection
    0 references
    tube domains
    0 references
    Cauchy-Szegö projection
    0 references
    polyhedral and simplicial cones
    0 references
    Siegel domains
    0 references

    Identifiers