Sequent reconstruction in LLM -- A sweepline proof (Q1892938)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 768744
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Sequent reconstruction in LLM -- A sweepline proof
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 768744

      Statements

      Sequent reconstruction in LLM -- A sweepline proof (English)
      0 references
      26 July 1995
      0 references
      Proof-nets for linear logic are defined as certain (inductively defined) graph structures satisfying a further (topological) correctness criterion. The criterion makes the construction of inductive arguments over proof-nets difficult. The fact that to any proof-net there corresponds a proof in the standard sequent presentation of the logic, is known as the sequentialization theorem, for which we know several proofs, all non-trivial. The paper gives a new proof of the theorem, applying a technique well-known in computational geometry (sweepline algorithms), which exploits the graphical nature of the nets. The sequent proof is reconstructed by processing the proof-net one slice at a time, starting with the top (at the axioms) and proceeding downwards. The crucial notion for this approach to work is that of standard layout of a proof-net (informally, each premise of a node lies above the node; the conclusion of a node lies below the node; for any par-node, all the other nodes which contribute to the construction of the formulas in the par lie above the par). Main (but not difficult) result of the paper is that any proof- net has a standard layout. At this point the sweepline algorithm is almost obvious. The paper starts with the pure multiplicative case. Then it covers the multiplicative constants and the exponentials. The unit for par and the weakening are treated by extending the proof-nets with a new kind of link (the probe), which ensures connectedness. With probes, the Danos-Regnier criterion holds also for constant and exponential proof- nets.
      0 references
      sweepline algorithms
      0 references
      linear logic
      0 references
      graph structures
      0 references
      proof-nets
      0 references
      sequent
      0 references
      sequentialization theorem
      0 references
      computational geometry
      0 references
      standard layout
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers