A mixed finite element for shell model with free edge boundary conditions. I: The mixed variational formulation. II: The numerical scheme (Q1913213)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A mixed finite element for shell model with free edge boundary conditions. I: The mixed variational formulation. II: The numerical scheme
scientific article

    Statements

    A mixed finite element for shell model with free edge boundary conditions. I: The mixed variational formulation. II: The numerical scheme (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    24 November 1996
    0 references
    After a very brief recall on general shell theory, we construct a mixed variational formulation based on the introduction of a new unknown: the rotation of the normal to the medium surface. In Koiter shell theory (for instance), this rotation can be expressed with respect to the three components of the displacement field of the medium surface and their derivatives. The Lagrange multiplier corresponding to this relation (known as the Kirchhoff-Love kinematical assumption), is also introduced as an independent unknown. There are two main difficulties: one is due to the differential geometry of surfaces and is rather technical; the other is to define correctly the dual space for the Kirchhoff-Love relation. From the mixed variational formulation suggested in Part I, we construct a finite element scheme. Then, a mathematical justification concerning the error estimate is developed. The most important point is to justify two compatibility conditions between the approximation of the kinematics and the stresses. Because of the structure of the shell operator they are not obvious at all, and several restrictions on the mesh are necessary. Therefore, the classical result known in fluid mechanics for Stokes equations cannot be applied directly.
    0 references
    0 references
    rotation of normal to medium surface
    0 references
    Lagrange multiplier
    0 references
    Kirchhoff-Love kinematical assumption
    0 references
    error estimate
    0 references