Real \(K(\pi ,1)\) arrangements from finite root systems (Q1920891)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 913764
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Real \(K(\pi ,1)\) arrangements from finite root systems
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 913764

      Statements

      Real \(K(\pi ,1)\) arrangements from finite root systems (English)
      0 references
      6 August 1996
      0 references
      The author studies the complement of certain classes of subspace arrangements in real \(n\)-space that are invariant under the action of \(S_n\) by permuting the coordinates and whose subspaces are defined by equality of certain coordinates. Such arrangements are called ``orbit arrangements'' and were introduced by \textit{A. Björner} [in `First European congress of mathematics', Prog. Math. 119, 321-370 (1994; Zbl 0844.52008)]. The author gives a positive answer to the question raised by Björner in the article mentioned, whether the complement of the arrangement consisting of all subspaces in real \(n\)-space defined by having three coordinates equal (``3-equal arrangement'') is a \(K(\pi,1)\)-space (resp., the classifying space of the discrete group \(\pi\) being the fundamental group of the complement). By a result of \textit{A. Björner} and the reviewer [Adv. Math. 110, No. 2, 277-313 (1995; Zbl 0845.57020)] only arrangements of subspaces of real codimension two can be \(K(\pi,1)\)-spaces. So there are only two other \(S_n\)-invariant arrangements defined by equality of coordinates, that are candidates for the complement being a \(K(\pi,1)\)-space. The first is the arrangement of subspaces defined by having two disjoint pairs of coordinates equal. The second is the union of this arrangement with the 3-equal arrangement. For the first, the author demonstrates that the complement is homotopy equivalent to a wedge of circles and hence \(K(\pi,1)\). The second space is also shown to be \(K(\pi,1)\) by the general result that is invoked to treat 3-equal arrangement. In all cases the fundamental groups are described. Then the author studies analogs of the previous construction for other root systems (i.e., arrangements of intersections of pairs of reflecting hyperplanes). The \(K(\pi,1)\) property is established in some cases (answering another question by Björner) and a general conjecture is raised.
      0 references
      Eilenberg-MacLane space
      0 references
      Coxeter group
      0 references
      orbit arrangements
      0 references
      subspace arrangements
      0 references
      classifying space
      0 references
      discrete group
      0 references
      root systems
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers