Genus and symmetry in homotopy theory (Q1923237)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Genus and symmetry in homotopy theory
scientific article

    Statements

    Genus and symmetry in homotopy theory (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    23 June 1997
    0 references
    In response to a question raised by \textit{C. A. McGibbon} the author gives an example of 1-connected finite CW-complexes, \(Z\) and \(Z'\), closed 4-dimensional manifolds, such that \(Z\) and \(Z'\) have the same (Mislin) genus (for each prime \(p\), the \(p\)-localization \(X_{(p)}\) and \(Y_{(p)}\) are homotopy equivalent), but \(\Aut(Z)\) and \(\Aut(Z')\) are finite groups having different cardinalities. The author also considers questions of genus invariance for the subgroup \(\Aut_*(X)\subset \Aut(X)\) consisting of those automorphisms inducing the identity on all integral homology groups. If \(X,Y\) are 2-connected finite CW-complexes in the same genus, he demonstrates that the groups \(\Aut_*(X)\) and \(\Aut_*(Y)\) are finitely generated nilpotent groups in the same genus. Using the subgroup \(\text{WI} (X) \subset\Aut(X)\) of homotopy classes of self-homotopy equivalences which are weakly homotopic to the identity map the author shows that for infinite CW-complexes the isomorphism class of \(\Aut_*(X)\) need not be a genus invariant. At the end of the paper two questions are formulated, variants of McGibbon's questions, concerning genus invariance for the subgroups \(\Aut_*(X)\) and \(\Aut(X)\).
    0 references
    localization
    0 references
    finite CW-complexes
    0 references
    4-dimensional manifolds
    0 references
    genus
    0 references
    integral homology groups
    0 references
    nilpotent groups
    0 references
    self-homotopy equivalences
    0 references

    Identifiers