Variations on twins in permutations (Q2048547)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7379542
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Variations on twins in permutations
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7379542

      Statements

      Variations on twins in permutations (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      6 August 2021
      0 references
      Summary: Let \(\pi\) be a permutation of the set \([n]=\{1,2,\dots, n\}\). Two disjoint order-isomorphic subsequences of \(\pi\) are called twins. How long twins are contained in every permutation? The well known Erdős-Szekeres theorem implies that there is always a pair of twins of length \(\Omega(\sqrt{n})\). On the other hand, by a simple probabilistic argument \textit{M. Gawron} [Izomorficzne podstruktury w s lowach i permutacjach. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński (Master Thesis) (2014)] proved that for every \(n\geqslant 1\) there exist permutations with all twins having length \(O(n^{2/3})\). He conjectured that the latter bound is the correct size of the longest twins guaranteed in every permutation. We support this conjecture by showing that almost all permutations contain twins of length \(\Omega(n^{2/3}/\log n^{1/3})\). Recently, \textit{B. Bukh} and \textit{O. Rudenko} [SIAM J. Discrete Math. 34, No. 3, 1620--1622 (2020; Zbl 1450.05001)] have tweaked our proof and removed the log-factor. For completeness, we also present our version of their proof (see Remark 2 below on the interrelation between the two proofs). In addition, we study several variants of the problem with diverse restrictions imposed on the twins. For instance, if we restrict attention to twins avoiding a fixed permutation \(\tau \), then the corresponding extremal function equals \(\Theta(\sqrt{n})\), provided that \(\tau\) is not monotone. In case of block twins (each twin occupies a segment) we prove that it is \((1+o(1))\frac{\log n}{\log\log n} \), while for random permutations it is twice as large. For twins that jointly occupy a segment (tight twins), we prove that for every \(n\) there are permutations avoiding them on all segments of length greater than 24.
      0 references
      subpermutation
      0 references
      permutation pattern
      0 references
      twins
      0 references

      Identifiers