On blowup of secant varieties of curves (Q2055188)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On blowup of secant varieties of curves
scientific article

    Statements

    On blowup of secant varieties of curves (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    3 December 2021
    0 references
    In this article the authors identify the \(k\)-th secant bundle \(B^k(L)\) on a nonsingular projective curve \(C\) with the blowup of its \(k\)-th secant variety \(\Sigma_k(C,L)\) along the \((k-1)\)-th secant variety \(\Sigma_{k-1}(C,L)\). This work is a continuation of a previous article of them in which they showed that \(B^k(L)\) is the normalization of \(\Sigma_k(C,L)\) along \(\Sigma_{k-1}(C,L)\). The working setting is the following: the ground field is algebraically closed of characteristic zero; \(C\) is a nonsingular projective curve of genus \(g\geq 0\); \(L\) is a very ample line bundle on \(C\) giving the embedding \(C\hookrightarrow \mathbb P (H^0(C,L))\); \(k\geq 0\) is an integer satisfying the inequality \(\deg L \geq 2g+2k+1\). In Section 1 the authors recall the definition of the \(k\)-th secant bundle \(B^k(L)\) on \(C\) and show how to use it to give an alternative definition of \(\Sigma_k\). In this construction a key role is played by the property of ``separating points'', which \(L\) has under the above assumption on \(\deg L\): in this case, the identification \(H^0(B^k(L),\mathcal{O}_{B^k(L)}(1))=H^0(C,L)\) holds and the complete linear system \(|\mathcal{O}_{B^k(L)}(1)|\) induces a morphism \(\beta_k: B^k(L)\rightarrow \mathbb P(H^0(C,L))\). Thus \(\Sigma_k\) is defined as the image of the morphism \(\beta_k\). Moreover, since \(\beta_k^{-1}(\Sigma_{k-1})\) is a divisor on \(B^k(L)\), one gets a morphism from \(B^k(L)\) to the blowup of \(\Sigma_k\) along \(\Sigma_{k-1}\). In order to prove that \(B^k(L)\) actually is the blowup itself (Theorem 1.1), the authors define a line bundle \(A_{k+1,L}\) on the symmetric product \(C_{k+1}:=C^{\times (k+1)}/\mathfrak{S}_{k+1}\) and prove that it is very ample under the above assumption on \(\deg L\) (Proposition 1.2). In Section 2 the above results are proved together with other preliminary ones.
    0 references
    secant variety
    0 references
    secant sheaf
    0 references
    secant bundle
    0 references
    blowup
    0 references

    Identifiers