Canonical maps of general hypersurfaces in abelian varieties (Q2055233)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Canonical maps of general hypersurfaces in abelian varieties
scientific article

    Statements

    Canonical maps of general hypersurfaces in abelian varieties (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    3 December 2021
    0 references
    This paper is devoted to canonical maps of general hypersurfaces in abelian varieties. The main result obtained is that, for a general pair \((A,X)\) of an (ample) hypersurface \(X\) in an abelian variety \(A\), the canonical map \(\Phi_X\) of \(X\) is birational onto its image if the polarization given by \(X\) is not principal (i.e., its Pfaffian \(d\) is not equal to \(1\)). This work was motivated by a theorem obtained by the first author in a joint work with \textit{F.-O. Schreyer} [in: Algebraic geometry. A volume in memory of Paolo Francia. Berlin: de Gruyter. 79--116 (2002; Zbl 1053.14048)] on canonical surfaces: if you have a polarization of type \((1, 1, 2)\) then the image \(\Sigma\) of the canonical map \(\Phi_X\) is in general a surface of degree \(12\) in \(\mathbb{P}^3\), birational to \(X\), while for the special case where \(X\) is the pull-back of the theta divisor of a curve of genus \(3\), then the canonical map has degree \(2\), and \(\Sigma\) has degree \(6\). The authors also show that, setting \(g=\dim(A)\), and letting \(d\) be the Pfaffian of the polarization given by \(X\), then if \(X\) is smooth and \(\Phi_X:X\longrightarrow\mathbb{P}^{N:=g+d-2}\) is an embedding, then necessarily they have the inequality \(d\geq g+1\), equivalent to \(N:=g+d-2\geq2\dim(X)+1\). Hence the authors formulate the following interesting conjecture, motivated by work of the second author: if \(d\geq g+1\), then, for a general pair \((A,X)\), \(\Phi_X\) is an embedding. This paper is organized as follows: Section 1 is an introduction to the subject and a description of the results. Section 2 is devoted to the proof of the main result. Section 3 deals with embedding obstruction. In section 4, the authors conclude this paper with some remarks on the conjecture.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    hypersurfaces
    0 references
    abelian varieties
    0 references
    canonical maps
    0 references
    Gauss maps
    0 references
    theta divisors
    0 references
    automorphisms of a covering
    0 references
    monodromy groups
    0 references
    generic coverings
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references