Hereditary cotorsion pairs and silting subcategories in extriangulated categories (Q2068129)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Hereditary cotorsion pairs and silting subcategories in extriangulated categories
    scientific article

      Statements

      Hereditary cotorsion pairs and silting subcategories in extriangulated categories (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      19 January 2022
      0 references
      The paper under review studies hereditary cotorsion pairs in extriangulated categories, and their relation with silting subcategories and co-t-structures. Let \((\mathcal{C},\mathbb{E},\mathfrak{s})\) be an extriangulated category, where \(\mathcal{C}\) is an additive \(R\)-linear category (\(R\) an associative ring with identity), \(\mathbb{E} \colon \mathcal{C}^{\mathrm{op}} \times \mathcal{C} \longrightarrow \mathsf{Mod}(R)\) is an \(R\)-bilinear functor, and \(\mathfrak{s}\) is a realization of \(\mathbb{E}\). Two subcategories \(\mathcal{X}\) and \(\mathcal{Y}\) of \(\mathcal{C}\) form a (complete) cotorsion pair \((\mathcal{X,Y})\) if \(\mathcal{X}\) and \(\mathcal{Y}\) are closed under direct summands, \(\mathbb{E}(\mathcal{X,Y}) = 0\), and for every object \(C \in \mathcal{C}\) there exist two \(\mathfrak{s}\)-conflations \(Y \to X \to C \dashrightarrow\) and \(C \to Y' \to X' \dashrightarrow\) with \(X, X' \in \mathcal{X}\) and \(Y, Y' \in \mathcal{Y}\). If in addition \(\mathbb{E}^k(\mathcal{X,Y}) = 0\) for every \(k \geq 2\), then \((\mathcal{X,Y})\) is said to be hereditary. The collection of cotorsion pairs form a partially ordered set with the following relation: given \(x_1 = (\mathcal{X}_1,\mathcal{Y}_1)\) and \(x_2 = (\mathcal{X}_2,\mathcal{Y}_2)\), then \(x_1 \leq x_2\) if \(\mathcal{Y}_1 \subseteq \mathcal{Y}_2\). In this case, \([x_1,x_2]\) denotes the interval of cotorsion pairs \(x\) for which \(x_1 \leq x \leq x_2\). In their first main result (Theorem 3.6), the authors show the existence of an isomorphism between the interval \([x_1,x_2]\) and the poset \(\mathsf{cotors}(\mathcal{H}_{[x_1,x_2]})\) of cotorsion pairs in the coheart \(\mathcal{H}_{[x_1,x_2]} := \mathcal{X}_1 \cap \mathcal{Y}_2\). Namely, \(\Phi \colon [x_1,x_2] \to \mathsf{cotors}(\mathcal{H}_{[x_1,x_2]})\) is given by \(\Phi(\mathcal{X,Y}) := (\mathcal{X} \cap \mathcal{Y}_2,\mathcal{X}_1 \cap \mathcal{Y})\) with inverse \(\Psi \colon \mathsf{cotors}(\mathcal{H}_{[x_1,x_2]}) \to [x_1,x_2]\) defined as \(\Psi(\mathcal{A,B}) := (\mathsf{add}(\mathcal{X}_2 \ast \mathcal{A}),\mathsf{add}(\mathcal{B}\ast \mathcal{Y}_1))\), where \(\mathsf{add}(\mathcal{X}_2 \ast \mathcal{A})\) denotes the smallest subcategory of \(\mathcal{C}\) containing \(\mathcal{X}_2 \ast \mathcal{A}\) (the subcategory of objects \(C\) in \(\mathcal{C}\) admitting an \(\mathfrak{s}\)-conflation \(X \to C \to A \dashrightarrow\) with \(X \in \mathcal{X}_2\) and \(A \in \mathcal{A}\)) which is closed under direct summands and finite direct sums. In the case where \(\mathcal{C}\) is a triangulated category, the previous isomorphism recovers a result by \textit{D. Pauksztello} and \textit{A. Zvonareva} [``Co-t-structures, cotilting and cotorsion pairs'', Preprint, \url{arXiv:2007.06536}], namely, an isomorphism between the interval of co-t-structures and the poset of cotorsion pairs in its coheart (see Corollary 3.9). The second main result in this article establishes a bijective correspondence between the set of bounded hereditary cotorsion pairs in an extriangulated category \(\mathcal{C}\) and the set of silting subcategories of \(\mathcal{C}\). The latter is a generalization, proposed by the authors, of the notion of silting subcategories in a triangulated category. Specifically, \(\mathcal{M} \subseteq \mathcal{C}\) is silting if \(\mathcal{M}\) is closed under direct summands and finite direct sums, \(\mathbb{E}^k(\mathcal{M,M}) = 0\) for every \(k \geq 1\), and \(\mathcal{C}\) is the smallest thick subcategory containing \(\mathcal{M}\). In this setting, it is proved in Theorem 5.7 that the map \((\mathcal{X,Y}) \mapsto \mathcal{X} \cap \mathcal{Y}\) gives rise to the bijection mentioned before, with inverse given by \(\mathcal{M} \mapsto (\mathcal{M}^\vee,\mathcal{M}^\wedge)\). Here, \(\mathcal{M}^\wedge\) and \(\mathcal{M}^\vee\) are the classes of objects in \(\mathcal{C}\) that can be finitely resolved or coresolved by objects in \(\mathcal{X}\), where (co)resolutions are thought in terms of \(\mathfrak{s}\)-conflations. For particular choices of \(\mathcal{C}\), the authors recover several well known results. For instance, if \(\mathcal{C}\) is triangulated, then there is a bijection between bounded co-t-structures in \(\mathcal{C}\) and silting subcategories in \(\mathcal{C}\), as proved by \textit{O. Mendoza Hernández} et al. [Appl. Categ. Struct. 21, No. 5, 417--440 (2013; Zbl 1291.18017)]. Moreover, the bijection between the set of isomorphism classes of basic tilting modules and the set of contravariantly finite resolving subcategories [\textit{M. Auslander} and \textit{I. Reiten}, Adv. Math. 86, No. 1, 111--152 (1991; Zbl 0774.16006)] is another application that follows from Theorem 5.7 and other bijections proved by the authors that involve silting subcategories of extriangulated categories.
      0 references
      extriangulated categories
      0 references
      cotorsion pairs
      0 references
      silting subcategories
      0 references
      co-t-structures
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers