Intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized aggregation operators based on priority degrees with application to multicriteria decision-making (Q2071883)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7466782
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized aggregation operators based on priority degrees with application to multicriteria decision-making
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7466782

      Statements

      Intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized aggregation operators based on priority degrees with application to multicriteria decision-making (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      31 January 2022
      0 references
      Summary: In practise, intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IFNs) are particularly useful for describing ambiguous data. We look at multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) problems with a prioritising relationship between the parameters. The concept of a priority degree is presented. The aggregation operators (AOs) are formed by assigning nonnegative real numbers to stringent priority levels, known as priority degrees. As a result, we construct ``intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized averaging operator with priority degrees'' and ``intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized geometric operator with priority degrees,'' which are both prioritized operators. The attributes of the existing method are frequently compared to those of other current approaches, stressing the superiority of the provided work over other methods now in use. In addition, the impact of priority degrees on the overall result is thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, in the intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) context, a decision-making strategy is proposed based on these operators. To highlight the efficacy of the proposed approach, an illustrative example relating to the selection of the best choice is considered.
      0 references

      Identifiers