Small doubling in cyclic groups (Q2109417)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Small doubling in cyclic groups
scientific article

    Statements

    Small doubling in cyclic groups (English)
    0 references
    21 December 2022
    0 references
    An important problem in additive combinatorics is to understand the structure of small-doubling sets, which are sets \(A\) of a group elements such that \(2A := \{a+b: a,b \in A\}\) has size comparable with the size of \(A\). The main result of the paper is the following: Theorem 1.1. Let \(n\) be a positive integer. If a set \(A \subset \mathbb Z_n\) satisfies \(|2A| < \frac 94 |A|\), then one of the following holds: \begin{itemize} \item[(i)] There is a subgroup \(H \le \mathbb Z_n\) such that \(A\) is contained in an \(H\)-coset and \(|A| > \frac{|H|}{2 \cdot 10^5}\). \item[(ii)] There is a proper subgroup \(H < \mathbb Z_n\) and an arithmetic progression \(P\) of size \(|P| > 1\) such that \(|P+H| = |P||H|\), \(A \subseteq P+H\), and \((|P| - 1)|H| \le |2A| - |A|\). \item[(iii)] There is a proper subgroup \(H < \mathbb Z_n\) such that \(A\) meets exactly three \(H\)-cosets, the cosets are not in an arithmetic progression, and \(3|H| \le |2A| - |A|\). \end{itemize} This theorem improves a result by \textit{J.-M. Deshouillers} and \textit{G. A. Freiman} [Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 86, No. 1, 1--28 (2003; Zbl 1032.11009)]. The properness of \(H\) in (ii) and (iii) follows from \(|H| \le |2A| - |A| < |2A|\). Similarly, if the equality \(|H+P| = |P||H|\) does not hold, then \(P+H\) is a coset of a subgroup of size at most \((|P|-1)|H| \le |2A| - |A| < \frac 54 |A|\), therefore \(|P+H| = |P||H|\) can be enforced by reclassifying \(A\) from type (ii) to type (i) whenever possible. Furthermore, the coefficient \(9/4\) in Theorem 1.1 is optimal, in the sense that the assumption of (i) cannot be relaxed even to \(|2A| \le \frac 94 |A|\). In fact, if \(n\) is large enough and \(A = \{-1,0,1\} \cup \{a\}\) with \(a \not\in \{-3,\dots,3\}\) and \(2a \not\in \{-2,\dots,2\}\), then \(|2A| = \frac 94 |A|\) while \(A\) does not have the desired structure. However, it is expected the following. Conjecture 1.4. For any \(\varepsilon > 0\) there exist positive constants \(C_1(\varepsilon)\) and \(C_2(\varepsilon)\) such that if \(n\) is a positive integer, and \(A \subseteq \mathbb Z_n\) satisfies \(|A| < \frac{n}{C_1(\varepsilon)}\) and \(|2A| < (3 - \varepsilon)|A|\), then there are a subset \(P \subseteq \mathbb Z_n\) with \(|2P|/|P| \le |2A|/|A|\) and a proper subgroup \(H < \mathbb Z_n\) such that \(A \subseteq P+H\), \((|2P| - |P|)|H| \le |2A| - |A|\), and either \(|P| \le C_2(\varepsilon)\), or \(P\) is an arithmetic progression. We notice that \(|2P|/|P| \le |2A|/|A|\) follows from the other assertions: \[ |A| \left( \frac{|2P|}{|P|} - 1 \right) \le |P||H| \left( \frac{|2P|}{|P|} - 1 \right) = (|2P| - |P|)|H| \le |2A| - |A| = |A| \left( \frac{|2A|}{|A|} - 1 \right). \] Theorem 1.1 and Conjecture 1.4 show that any set with the small doubling coefficient is, essentially, obtained by ``lifting'' a small-doubling set which is either nicely structured (an arithmetic progression), or otherwise belongs to a finite collection of sporadic examples. Two other classical results which Theorem 1.1 is worth comparing with are Kneser's theorem (that deals with small-doubling sets in arbitrary abelian groups, but requires the doubling coefficient \(|2A|/|A|\) to be smaller than \(2\), see [\textit{M. Kneser}, Math. Z. 58, 459--484 (1953; Zbl 0051.28104); Math. Z. 61, 429--434 (1955; Zbl 0064.04305); \textit{H. B. Mann}, Addition theorems: the addition theorems of group theory and number theory. New York, NY: Interscience Publishers (1965; Zbl 0127.27203)]), and Freiman's \((3n-3)\)-theorem (that allows the doubling coefficient to be as large as \(3-o(1)\), but assumes the underlying group to be torsion-free, see [\textit{G. A. Freĭman}, Sov. Math., Dokl. 2, 1520--1522 (1961; Zbl 0109.27203); translation from Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 141, 571--573 (1961)] and [\textit{D. J. Grynkiewicz}, Structural additive theory. Based on courses given at Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria, 2008--2012. Cham: Springer (2013; Zbl 1368.11109), Chapter 7]). The proof of Theorem 1.1 is inductive and uses both Kneser's and Freiman's theorems, as well as character sums and combinatorics.
    0 references
    0 references
    small doubling
    0 references
    doubling constant
    0 references
    coset progressions
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers