Linear versus lattice embeddings between Banach lattices (Q2161311)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Linear versus lattice embeddings between Banach lattices
scientific article

    Statements

    Linear versus lattice embeddings between Banach lattices (English)
    0 references
    4 August 2022
    0 references
    It is proved (Theorem A) that \textit{\(C[0,1]\) is linearly embeddable in a Banach lattice \(X\) if and only if it is lattice embeddable in \(X\)}, a property shared by \(c_0\). In combination with Theorem (A) from [\textit{N. Ghoussoub}, Math. Ann. 262, 461--472 (1983; Zbl 0511.46016)] and Theorem 2 from [\textit{H. P. Lotz} and \textit{H. P. Rosenthal}, Isr. J. Math. 31, 169--179 (1978; Zbl 0388.46014)], the following result is then obtained. Corollary 2.4. The following statements are equivalent for a Banach lattice \(X\): \begin{itemize} \item[1.] \(C[0,1]\) is linearly embeddable in \(X\); \item[2.] \(C[0,1]\) is lattice embeddable in \(X\); \item[3.] \(L_1\) is lattice embeddable in \(X^\ast\); \item[4.] \(C(\Delta)^\ast\) is lattice embeddable in \(X^\ast\); \item[5.] There is an order bounded sequence in \(X\) with no weak Cauchy subsequence. \end{itemize} By combining Theorem A with Theorem II.2 in [\textit{N. Ghoussoub} and \textit{W. B. Johnson}, Math. Z. 194, 153--171 (1987; Zbl 0618.46025)] and Theorem 4.69 in [\textit{C. D. Aliprantis} and \textit{O. Burkinshaw}, Positive operators. Reprint of the 1985 original. Berlin: Springer (2006; Zbl 1098.47001)] the authors obtain (Corollary 2.5) that \textit{if \(\ell_1\) linearly embeds in the Banach lattice \(X\), then \(X\) contains \(\ell_1\) or \(C[0,1]\) as a sublattice.} Let us here denote by (\(*\)) the above common property of \(c_0\) and \(C[0,1]\), cf. Theorem~A. The authors ask which Banach lattices have (\(*\)) and solve that problem completely in the separable case (Theorem B): \textit{A separable Banach lattice has \((*)\) exactly when it is lattice embeddable in \(C[0,1]\).} A key ingredient in the proof of Theorem B is the following very interesting result (Theorem C): \textit{An infinite-dimensional closed sublattice of \(C[0,1]\) is either lattice isomorphic to \(c_0\) or it contains a closed sublattice isomorphic to \(C[0,1]\).} The proof of Theorem A is built on results of Lotz, Rosenthal and Ghoussoub in combination with the very recent theory of projective Banach lattices, introduced in [\textit{B. de Pagter} and \textit{A. W. Wickstead}, Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A, Math. 145, No. 1, 105--143 (2015; Zbl 1325.46020)], in particular the fact that \(C[0,1]\) is projective.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Banach lattice
    0 references
    linear embedding
    0 references
    lattice embedding
    0 references
    AM-space
    0 references
    space of continuous functions $C[0,1]$
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references