Improved bounds for induced poset saturation (Q2185221)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Improved bounds for induced poset saturation
    scientific article

      Statements

      Improved bounds for induced poset saturation (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      4 June 2020
      0 references
      Summary: Given a finite poset \(\mathcal{P} \), a family \(\mathcal{F}\) of elements in the Boolean lattice is induced-\( \mathcal{P} \)-saturated if \(\mathcal{F}\) contains no copy of \(\mathcal{P}\) as an induced subposet but every proper superset of \(\mathcal{F}\) contains a copy of \(\mathcal{P}\) as an induced subposet. The minimum size of an induced-\( \mathcal{P} \)-saturated family in the \(n\)-dimensional Boolean lattice, denoted \(\text{sat}^*(n,\mathcal{P})\), was first studied by \textit{M. Ferrara} et al. [Discrete Math. 340, No. 10, 2479--2487 (2017; Zbl 1423.06006)]. Our work focuses on strengthening lower bounds. For the 4-point poset known as the diamond, we prove \(\text{sat}^*(n,\mathcal{D}_2)\geqslant\sqrt{n} \), improving upon a logarithmic lower bound. For the antichain with \(k+1\) elements, we prove \[\text{sat}^*(n,\mathcal{A}_{k+1})\geqslant \left(1-\frac{1}{\log_2k}\right)\frac{kn}{\log_2 k}\] for \(n\) sufficiently large, improving upon a lower bound of \(3n-1\) for \(k\geqslant 3\).
      0 references

      Identifiers