Do humans reason with \(\mathcal{E} \)-matchers? (Q2185478)
From MaRDI portal
 | This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Do humans reason with E -matchers? |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7208742
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Do humans reason with \(\mathcal{E} \)-matchers? |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7208742 |
Statements
Do humans reason with \(\mathcal{E} \)-matchers? (English)
0 references
4 June 2020
0 references
logic programming
0 references
weak completion semantics
0 references
fluent calculus
0 references
ethical decision making
0 references
0.8286325335502625
0 references
0.7020717859268188
0 references
0.6924164891242981
0 references
0.6713968515396118
0 references
0.6483306884765625
0 references
