Do humans reason with E -matchers?

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-22102-7_17MaRDI QIDQ2185478zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Steffen Hölldobler

Publication date 4 June 2020

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22102-7_17

zbMATH Keywords

logic programmingfluent calculusethical decision makingweak completion semantics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Cognitive psychology (91E10) Logic programming (68N17) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• The weak completion semantics and equality
• A core method for the weak completion semantics with skeptical abduction
• Conditional Reasoning and Relevance
• Modeling the suppression task under weak completion and well-founded semantics
• A new computational logic approach to reason with conditionals

Cited in

(2)

• A core method for the weak completion semantics with skeptical abduction
• The weak completion semantics and equality

This page was built for publication: Do humans reason with \(\mathcal{E} \)-matchers?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2185478)