Do humans reason with E -matchers?

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-22102-7_17zbMATH Open1444.68182OpenAlexW2956081066MaRDI QIDQ2185478FDOQ2185478

Authors: Steffen Hölldobler 

Publication date: 4 June 2020

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22102-7_17

Recommendations

• The weak completion semantics and equality
• A core method for the weak completion semantics with skeptical abduction
• Conditional Reasoning and Relevance
• Modeling the suppression task under weak completion and well-founded semantics
• A new computational logic approach to reason with conditionals

zbMATH Keywords

logic programmingfluent calculusethical decision makingweak completion semantics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Cognitive psychology (91E10) Logic programming (68N17) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cited In (2)

• The weak completion semantics and equality
• A core method for the weak completion semantics with skeptical abduction

This page was built for publication: Do humans reason with \(\mathcal{E} \)-matchers?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2185478)