Detangling robustness in high dimensions: composite versus model-averaged estimation (Q2192312)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Detangling robustness in high dimensions: composite versus model-averaged estimation |
scientific article |
Statements
Detangling robustness in high dimensions: composite versus model-averaged estimation (English)
0 references
17 August 2020
0 references
Consider a linear regression problem \(Y=X \beta + \epsilon\), with the design matrix \(X\), the vector \(\beta\) of unknown parameters to be estimated, and the vector \(Y\) of observations. The error vector \(\epsilon\) has independent, identically distributed, zero-mean components. Two types of weighted estimators are considered: i) model-averaged estimators, where estimators from different estimation methods or models are weighted and averaged, and ii) composite estimators, where weighted different loss functions are averaged. Moreover, regularized estimators and estimators with optimized weights are considered. The performance of the estimators is compared, where especially the uncertainty in the selection of the weights is taken into account. Computational results are given.
0 references
linear regression
0 references
averaged weighted estimation methods
0 references
weight uncertainty
0 references
comparison of performances
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references