Stable Higgs bundles on ruled surfaces (Q2195672)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7241039
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Stable Higgs bundles on ruled surfaces
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7241039

      Statements

      Stable Higgs bundles on ruled surfaces (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      27 August 2020
      0 references
      For any smooth projective variety \(X\) defined over an algebraically closed field with characteristic \(0\) an Higgs vector bundle on \(X\) is a pair \((V,\theta)\), where \(V\) is a vector bundle (or torsion-free sheaf) on \(X\), \(\theta: V\to V\otimes \Omega^1_X\) is a morphisn with the integrality condition \(\theta \wedge \theta =0\). For any polarization \(L\) on \(Y\) there are moduli space of \(L\)-stable Higgs bundles and of equivalence classes of \(L\)-semistable Higgs bundles with prescribed Chern classes. Here \(X = \mathbb{P}_C(E)\) is a ruled surface over a smooth curve \(C\) of genus \(g\ge 2\).The author proves that pull-backs \(V \to \pi^\ast(V)\) make essentially an equivalence between stable (or semistable) vector bundles on \(C\) and \(L\)-stable vector bundles on \(X\) with pull-bach \(c_1\) and \(c_2=0\). A tool is the Bogomolov inequality for semistable Higgs bundles \((V,\theta)\) (\(V\) is not necessarily semistable as abstract bundle). In particular (for these \(c_1\)'s and \(c_2=0\) and any rank) there are always semistable pairs on \(X\).
      0 references
      0 references
      semistable
      0 references
      Higgs bundle
      0 references
      moduli spaces
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references