Unsteady RANS modeling of flow around two-dimensional rectangular cylinders with different side ratios at Reynolds number \(6.85 \times 10^5\) (Q2209208)
From MaRDI portal
![]() | This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Unsteady RANS modeling of flow around two-dimensional rectangular cylinders with different side ratios at Reynolds number \(6.85 \times 10^5\) |
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Unsteady RANS modeling of flow around two-dimensional rectangular cylinders with different side ratios at Reynolds number \(6.85 \times 10^5\) |
scientific article |
Statements
Unsteady RANS modeling of flow around two-dimensional rectangular cylinders with different side ratios at Reynolds number \(6.85 \times 10^5\) (English)
0 references
28 October 2020
0 references
Summary: In practical engineering, the Reynolds number (Re) of box girder structure is usually very high (\(\mathrm{Re} \geq 10^5\)), while most investigations of the flow around bluff bodies are concentrated on relatively lower Reynolds numbers (i.e., \(\mathrm{Re} = 10^3\)--\(10^4\)). This paper presented a numerical study of the unsteady flow around two-dimensional rectangular cylinders under a Reynolds number of \(6.85 \times 10^5\) with different side ratios (\(R = b/h \), width to height) ranging from 0.1 to 4.0. Three unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) two-equation \(k\)-\( \varepsilon \) turbulence models (standard, RNG, and realizable) were adopted in the study. The realizable \(k\)-\( \varepsilon \) model was chosen because it was found to perform the best among three models in the main aerodynamic integral parameters. According to the distinctions of aerodynamic characteristics with different side ratios, three regimes were divided and discussed in detail. The distribution of surface pressure over cylinders, the wake parameters, and vorticity contours of the rectangular cylinders with different side ratios were discussed.
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references