Axiomatic theory of betweenness (Q2219098)

From MaRDI portal
!
WARNING

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes.

Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7297807
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Axiomatic theory of betweenness
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7297807

      Statements

      Axiomatic theory of betweenness (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      19 January 2021
      0 references
      This paper looks at set-betweenness from an axiomatic perspective. As one of several motivating examples presented by the authors, we have the notion of a subset $C$ of a metric space $\langle X,d\rangle$ being \textit{strictly between} two subsets $A$ and $B$-in symbols, $A|C|B$-if for each $a\in A$ and $b\in B$, there is a $c\in C\setminus\{a,b\}$ with $d(a,c)+d(c,b)=d(a,b)$. (This is a direct generalization of the notion of metric point-betweenness introduced by K.~Menger in the 1920s.) The principal focus of the paper is set-betweenness for simple graphs (with a possible loop at a vertex). Here $A|C|B$ holds if for each $a\in A$ and $b\in B$, and each edge path joining $a$ and $b$, there is an internal vertex of the path that belongs to $C$. The authors deliniate a quantifier-free first order language involving the ternary predicate $\cdot |\cdot |\cdot$ and constant symbols, a finite set of axioms in that language, and a straightforward semantics involving finite graphs. They than prove a soundness/completeness result for this system.
      0 references
      0 references
      betweenness
      0 references
      axiomatization
      0 references
      completeness theorem
      0 references

      Identifiers