Iteration of functions and contractibility of acyclic 2-complexes (Q2232007)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Iteration of functions and contractibility of acyclic 2-complexes
    scientific article

      Statements

      Iteration of functions and contractibility of acyclic 2-complexes (English)
      0 references
      1 October 2021
      0 references
      In this article, the author obtains an interesting connection between the theory of 2-dimensional complexes and the famous \(3x+1\) problem. Let \( \mathbb{N}\) be the set of positive natural numbers and \(f:\mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}\) be a function defined by \(f(x)=3x+1\) when \(x\) is odd, and \(f(x)=x/2\) when \(x\) is even. The Collatz conjecture states that every orbit of \(f\) contains \(1.\) A result of \textit{S. A. Kurtz} and \textit{J. Simon} [Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 4484, 542--553 (2007; Zbl 1198.03043)] implies that there can be no algorithm to decide whether the Collatz conjecture is true or not. Let \(\mathcal{P}(f)=\langle a_{i},i\in \mathbb{N} :a_{f(i)}^{-1}a_{i}a_{f(i)}=a_{i}^{2}\rangle \) and \(P(f)\) be the presentation 2-complex. The author proves that \(P(f)\) is contractible if and only if the Collatz conjecture holds. Since \(P(f)\) is aspherical and acyclic, there can be no algorithm to decide whether an infinite, recursively described, aspherical, acyclic presentation 2-complex is contractible.
      0 references
      \(3x+1\) problem
      0 references
      2-complexes
      0 references
      Collatz function
      0 references
      contractibility
      0 references
      iteration
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references