Comparison of three nonlinear filtering schemes (Q2266356)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Comparison of three nonlinear filtering schemes
scientific article

    Statements

    Comparison of three nonlinear filtering schemes (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    This paper introduces three numerical realization schemes for the nonlinear filtering algorithm, namely the Chebychev, Laguerre-Gauss, and the Hermite-Gauss quadrature schemes. Their efficiencies are compared between themselves, but not to the well known ''Extended Kalman Filter''. The Chebychev quadrature scheme (CQS) employs the oriented floating grid with finite domain of integration; the Laguerre-Gauss and Hermite-Gauss quadrature schemes (LGQS and HGQS) have the advantage of a simple floating grid with infinite domain of integration. A simple example of second order is presented. The more robust LGQS and HGQS algorithms required typically between 12 and 13 seconds of computing time per stage on the UNIVAC 1106 computer. The CQS algorithm required about 2.5 second per stage but was sensitive to the initial estimate.
    0 references
    comparison of algorithms
    0 references
    nonlinear filtering algorithm
    0 references
    Chebychev
    0 references
    Laguerre-Gauss
    0 references
    Hermite-Gauss
    0 references
    Extended Kalman Filter
    0 references
    quadrature
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references