On the number of flats tangent to convex hypersurfaces in random position (Q2283120)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the number of flats tangent to convex hypersurfaces in random position
scientific article

    Statements

    On the number of flats tangent to convex hypersurfaces in random position (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    30 December 2019
    0 references
    Given \(d_{k,n} = (k+1)(n-k)\) projective hypersurfaces \(X_{1}, \dots, X_{d_{k,n}} \subset \mathbb{RP}^{n}\), a classical problem in enumerative geometry is to determine how many \(k\)-dimensional projective subspaces of \(\mathbb{RP}^{n}\) are simultaneously tangent to \(X_{1}, \dots, X_{d_{k,n}}\). Geometrically speaking, consider the following scenario. Let \(\mathbb{G}(k,n)\) be the Grassmannian of \(k\)-dimensional projective subspaces, if \(X \subset \mathbb{RP}^{n}\) is a smooth hypersurface, we denote by \(\Omega_{k}(X) \subset \mathbb{G}(k,n)\) the variety of \(k\)-tangents to \(X\), i.e., the set of \(k\)-flats that are tangent to \(X\) at some point. The number of \(k\)-flats simultaneously tangent to hypersurfaces \(X_{1}, \dots, X_{d_{k,n}} \subset \mathbb{RP}^{n}\) equals to \[\# \Omega_{k}(X_{1}) \cap \dots \cap \# \Omega_{k}(X_{d_{k,n}}).\] This number, obviously, depends on the position of the hypersurfaces that we are considering in that problem. It is quite natural to look at this problem from a viewpoint of the randomness. One can ask for the expected value for the number of tangents to hypersurfaces in random position. We say that hypersurfaces \(X_{1}, \dots, X_{d_{k,n}} \subset \mathbb{RP}^{n}\) are in random position if each one of them is randomly translated by elements \(g_{1}, \dots, g_{d_{k,n}}\) sampled independently from the orthogonal group \(O(n+1)\) endowed with the uniform distribution. The main result of the paper is devoted to the case of convex hypersurfaces. We say that a subset \(C \subset \mathbb{RP}^{n}\) is called (strictly) convex if \(C\) does not intersect some hyperplane \(L\) and is (strictly) convex in the affine chart \(\mathbb{RP}^{n} \setminus L \simeq \mathbb{R}^{n}\). Now we say that a smooth hypersurface \(X \subset \mathbb{RP}^{n}\) is said to be convex if it bounds a strictly convex open set of \(\mathbb{RP}^{n}\). Finally, let us denote by \(\tau_{k}(X_{1}, \dots, X_{d_{k,n}})\) the average number of \(k\)-flats tangent to \(X_{1}, \dots, X_{d_{k,n}} \subset \mathbb{RP}^{n}\). Main Result. The average number of \(k\)-flats simultaneously tangent to convex hypersurfaces \(X_{1}, \dots, X_{d_{k,n}}\) in random position equals to \[\tau_{k}(X_{1}, \dots, X_{d_{k,n}}) =\delta_{k,n}\cdot \prod_{i=1}^{d_{k,n}}\frac{|\Omega_{k}(X_{i})|}{|Sch(k,n)|},\] where \(\delta_{k,n}\) is the so-called expected degree (i.e., the average number of \(k\)-flats incident to \(d_{k,n}\)-many random \((n-k-1)\)-flats), \(|Sch(k,n)|\) is the volume of the special Schubert variety of \(k\)-flats meeting a fixed \((n-k-1)\)-flat, and \(|\Omega_{k}(X)|\) is the volume of the manifold \(\Omega_{k}(X) \subset \mathbb{G}(k,n)\) of all \(k\)-flats tangent to \(X\). As a nice corollary, the authors show the following universal upper bound \[\tau_{k}(X_{1}, \dots, X_{d_{k,n}}) \leq \delta_{k,n}\cdot 4^{d_{k,n}}.\] Moreover, the authors present analogous results for semialgebraic hypersurfaces (not necessarily convex) satisfying some non-degeneracy assumptions.
    0 references
    0 references
    integral geometry
    0 references
    enumerative geometry
    0 references
    Schubert calculus
    0 references
    real Grassmannians
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references