Equivalence between the classical formulation of an elasticity theory problem and its possible formulation in terms of stresses (Q2291277)
From MaRDI portal
 | This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Equivalence between the classical formulation of an elasticity theory problem and its possible formulation in terms of stresses |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7160647
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Equivalence between the classical formulation of an elasticity theory problem and its possible formulation in terms of stresses |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7160647 |
Statements
Equivalence between the classical formulation of an elasticity theory problem and its possible formulation in terms of stresses (English)
0 references
30 January 2020
0 references
In the present notice the result of [\textit{D. V. Georgievskii}, Mosc. Univ. Mech. Bull. 68, No. 1, 1--7 (2013; Zbl 1409.74008); translation from Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. I 67, No. 6. 26--32 (2012)] about equivalence between the classical formulation of an elasticity theory problem and its possible formulation in terms of stresses for the case of a parallelepiped is generalized for a domain for whose boundary the Stokes formula is valid.
0 references
Beltrami-Michell compatibility equation
0 references
Stokes formula
0 references
arbitrary domain formulation
0 references
0.8060923218727112
0 references
0.7886927723884583
0 references
0.7844722867012024
0 references
0.7806203365325928
0 references
