Induced mappings on hyperspaces \(C(p,X)\) and \(K(X)\), some answers (Q2295648)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Induced mappings on hyperspaces C(p,X) and K(X), some answers |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7167611
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Induced mappings on hyperspaces \(C(p,X)\) and \(K(X)\), some answers |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7167611 |
Statements
Induced mappings on hyperspaces \(C(p,X)\) and \(K(X)\), some answers (English)
0 references
14 February 2020
0 references
In this interesting paper, the authors consider certain natural subspaces of hyperspaces of continua, and hyperspaces of such subspaces. Given a map \(f\) between continua, it extends in a natural way to the hyperspaces considered. The question addressed in this paper is: when do these extensions share interesting properties with \(f\)? The properties considered are being confluent, weakly confluent, light and open. An intricate example is presented that shows that some extension of a given map \(f\) is confluent, but another one of the same \(f\) is not weakly confluent. With previous published work, this completes the picture for all confluent and weakly confluent extensions of the same map. Another intricate continuum completes the information needed for a complete picture for light maps. And the same for open maps.
0 references
confluent mapping
0 references
continuum
0 references
hyperspace
0 references
induced mapping
0 references
light mapping
0 references
open mapping
0 references
weakly confluent mapping
0 references
0 references
0.8585071563720703
0 references
0.8507341742515564
0 references