Some notes on concordance between optimization and statistics (Q2298307)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Some notes on concordance between optimization and statistics |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7170712
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Some notes on concordance between optimization and statistics |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7170712 |
Statements
Some notes on concordance between optimization and statistics (English)
0 references
20 February 2020
0 references
Summary: Many engineering problems require solutions to statistical optimization problems. When the global solution is hard to attain, engineers or statisticians always use the better solution because we intuitively believe a principle, called better solution principle (BSP) in this paper, that a better solution to a statistical optimization problem also has better statistical properties of interest. This principle displays some concordance between optimization and statistics and is expected to widely hold. Since theoretical study on BSP seems to be neglected by statisticians, this paper presents a primary discussion on BSP within a relatively general framework. We demonstrate two comparison theorems as the key results of this paper. Their applications to maximum likelihood estimation are presented. It can be seen that BSP for this problem holds under reasonable conditions; i.e., an estimator with greater likelihood is better in some statistical sense.
0 references
0.7428508996963501
0 references
0.69972825050354
0 references
0.6933333277702332
0 references
0.6913682818412781
0 references