Incompleteness in the Bell theorem using non-contextual local realistic model (Q2300811)

In the paper under reviewing the authors studied the Bell theorem describing by multipartiite states. There are 2D-setting and 3D-setting model Bell experiments. In the noncontextual scenario, the two models are equivalent and one can not classify the local realistic theories. In the contextual scenario there is a different between the two models and one can classify the 3D-setting model. One may construct the 3D-setting model from the 2D-setting model. The authors show the incompleteness of the Bell Theorem in the noncontextual scenario. Consider the system of \(N\) spins \(\frac{1}{2}\) particles, parametrized by unit vectors \(\vec n_j, j=1,\dots,N\) in the 3D space with coordinate vectors \(\vec{x}_1^{(j_1)}, \dots \vec x_N^{(j_N)}\in \mathbb R^3\). The rational invariant tensor structure is defined by the correlation tensor \(\hat{T}\) such that the expectation is computed as \(E(\vec n_1,\dots, \vec n_N) = \hat{T}.(\vec{n}_1\otimes \dots, \otimes \vec{n}_N)\) with components \(T_{i_1\dots i_N} := E(\vec{x}_1^{(i_1)}, \dots \vec x_N^{(i_N)})\). If the correlation function is described by the local realistic theory, then the correlation tensor must be simulated by \(E_{LR}(\vec n_1,\dots,\vec n_N) = \int d\lambda\rho(\lambda) I^{(1)}(\vec{n}_1,\lambda)I^{(2)}(\vec{n}_2,\lambda)\dots I^{(N)}(\vec{n}_N,\lambda)\), where \(I^{(j)}(\vec{n}_j,\lambda)\) is the predetermined hidden result of measurement of dichotomic variable \(\vec{n}.\sigma\) with values \(\pm 1\). Because in the noncontextual scenario, the 2D-setting and 3D-setting models are equivalent, the unit vectors are parametrized by \(\vec{n}_j(\alpha^{l_j}_j) = \cos \alpha^{l_j}_j \vec{x}_j^{(1)} +\sin \alpha^{l_j}_j \vec{x}_j^{(2)}\). Choose \(\alpha_j^{(l_j)} = (l_j-1)\frac{\pi}{3}, j=1,\dots,N, l_j= 1,2,3\) then, as the main result of the paper, the authors proved that \((E_{LR},E) \leq 2^NT_{\max} < (E,E)=\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^N \sum_{i_1,\dots, i_N= 1,2} T^2_{i_1,\dots, i_N}\), that violates the Bell Theorem \((E_{LR},E) = (E,E)\).