A programming-based algorithm for probabilistic uncertain linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy group decision-making (Q2311029)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7078202
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    A programming-based algorithm for probabilistic uncertain linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy group decision-making
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7078202

      Statements

      A programming-based algorithm for probabilistic uncertain linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy group decision-making (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      10 July 2019
      0 references
      Summary: As an effective tool to express the subjective preferences of decision makers, the linguistic term sets (LTS) have been widely used in group decision-making (GDM) problems, such as hesitant fuzzy LTS, linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets, probabilistic LTS, etc. However, due to the increasing complexity of practical decision-making (DM) problems, LTS still has a lot of room to expand in fuzzy theory. Qualitative uncertainty information in the application of GDM is yet to be improved. Therefore, in order to improve the applicability of linguistic terms in DM problems, a probabilistic uncertain linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set (PULIFS) that can fully express the decision-maker's (DM's) evaluation information is first proposed. To improve the rationality of DM results, we give a method for determining individual weights in the probabilistic uncertain linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation (PULIFPR) environment. In addition, we present two consistency definitions of PULIFPR to reflect both the assessment information and risk attitudes of decision makers. Subsequently, a series of goal programming models (GPMs) are established, which effectively avoid the consistency check and correction process of existing methods. Finally, the developed method is applied to an empirical example concerning the selection of a virtual reality (VR) project. The advantages of the proposed method are demonstrated by comparative analysis.
      0 references
      group decision-making (GDM)
      0 references
      probabilistic uncertain linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation (PULIFPR)
      0 references
      consistency
      0 references
      goal programming model (GPM)
      0 references
      risk preference
      0 references

      Identifiers