Representation stability on the cohomology of complements of subspace arrangements (Q2316676)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Representation stability on the cohomology of complements of subspace arrangements
scientific article

    Statements

    Representation stability on the cohomology of complements of subspace arrangements (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    6 August 2019
    0 references
    This paper studies representation stability, in the sense of [\textit{T. Church} and \textit{B. Farb}, Adv. Math. 245, 250--314 (2013; Zbl 1300.20051)], of the cohomology groups of the complements of arrangements of linear subspaces of \(n\)-tuples in \(\mathbb{R}^n\) defined by sets of diagonal equalities and which are invariant under the action of the symmetric group \(S_n\) which permutes the coordinates. More precisely, let \(d\geq 2\) and \(n\) be natural numbers and let \(W_{\pi}^d\) denote the linear subspace of \(n\)-tuples \((w_1,\ldots,w_n)\) of points in \(\mathbb{R}^d\) such that \(w_i=w_j\), if \(i\) and \(j\) are in the same block in a set partition \(\pi\) of \(\{1,2,\ldots,n\}\). For an integer partition \(\lambda\), let \(\mathcal{A}_{\lambda}^d\) be the arrangement of subspaces \(W^d_{\pi}\) where \(\pi\) is of type \(\lambda\), and set \(\mathcal{A}_{\lambda}^d= \bigcup_{\lambda\in\Lambda} \mathcal{A}_{\lambda}^d\) for a finite set of integer partitions \(\Lambda\). The complements \(\mathcal{M}_{\Lambda}^d:= \mathbb{R}^{dn}\setminus \bigcup_{W\in\mathcal{A}_{\Lambda}^d} W\) come equipped with an \(S_n\)-action. Let \(\Lambda\) be a finite set of integer partitions of \(n_0\) not containing \((1^{n_0})\). For every \(n\geq n_0\), the author considers \(\Lambda^{(n)}\) as the set of integer partitions of \(n\) obtained from integer partitions in \(\Lambda\) by adding \(n-n_0\) parts of size \(1\). The main result of the paper, Theorem 1.1, shows that the sequence of reduced singular cohomology groups \(\left\{\tilde{H}^i(\mathcal{M}^d_{\Lambda^{(n)}};\mathbb{C})\right\}_n\) satisfies representation stability, giving an alternative proof of a special case of Theorem A in [\textit{N. Gadish}, Adv. Math. 322, 341--377 (2017; Zbl 1377.14012)] and of Theorem 4.15 in [\textit{D. Petersen}, Geom. Topol. 21, No. 4, 2527--2555 (2017; Zbl 1420.55027)]. Furthermore, Theorem 1.1 establishes new explicit stable ranges, and better stable bounds are obtained in Theorem 3.2 for the case of \(k\)-equal arrangements \(\mathcal{M}_{(k,1^{n-k})}^d\) for \(k\geq d+1\). In the particular case \(\Lambda=\{(2,1^{n-2})\}\), the complement \(\mathcal{M}^d_{\Lambda}\) is precisely the configuration space of \(n\) ordered points in \(\mathbb{R}^d\). Representation stability of the cohomology of this sequence of spaces was proved in [\textit{T. Church}, Invent. Math. 188, No. 2, 465--504 (2012; Zbl 1244.55012)] and optimal stable ranges were obtained in [\textit{P. Hersh} and \textit{V. Reiner}, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2017, No. 5, 1433--1486 (2017; Zbl 1404.20009)].
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    representation stability
    0 references
    subspace arrangement
    0 references
    symmetric functions
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references